User talk:FoCuSandLeArN/Archive 5

Article re-submitted for editing approval / Mydolls
Hello Wiki Reviewers,

I have been waiting patiently for someone to review my entry on the Mydolls, since I have made necessary changes, can anyone help?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mydolls&oldid=538452821

```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidrad (talk • contribs) 00:14, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * have you resubmitted the entry? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 00:18, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Scimitar oryx and other copy edits
FoCuSandLeArN, if you're going to copy edit at FAC level, please slow down and familiarise yourself with relevant aspects of MOS. Scientific names of Genus and Species names are itialicized. --Stfg (talk) 13:38, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I have exchanged emails with Torchiest and we've agreed that I will re-do the Scimitar Oryx copy edit. Sorry, but there are too many errors introduced and too many left uncorrected there. --Stfg (talk) 14:56, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I apologise for the inconvenience. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Eric Cutler (guitarist)
You denied my article for not having reliable sources. I used the website for the record label Eric Cutler has been signed to for 20 plus years. I fail to see this as unreliable. You and wokipedia are lame. Necrosiceric (talk) 16:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * i'm sorry you feel that way. we call those primary or self-published sources, and they're not enough to establish the subject's notability. please see Referencing for beginners. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 19:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:09, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

article
please what do i do, i need help how to improve this article, i just added more independent references. can you please review this article again. i need help to creat this articleAnaforlove (talk) 13:35, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * which article are you referring to? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

article2
Hi Thank you for your time As you told I add source and refrences in my article would you please have a look at th enew one My name is Vuedemonde and my article is shannon bennett thank you so much Kind regards http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Shannon_Bennett — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vuedemonde (talk • contribs) 01:36, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * it will be reviewed in due time. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!
 WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive. There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out! Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:50, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

article3
Hi there, I made a sandbox titled Iain Morrison (musician) that I then accidently submitted before it was finished. You kindly checked the page over and of course declined it. I finished the page and re-submitted on Feb 15th. If you have time would you take another look, see how I've done this time round. Would really appreciate it. Thanks. Tripping alone (talk) 21:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)tripping alone
 * your article will be reviewed shortly. can i have a link? cheers, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The Teahouse Turns One!
It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!


 * --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 05:40, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Patent nonsense speedy delete
FoCu, just so you know, the patent nonsense speedy delete should only be used on articles that make no sense. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phoolan devi says "phoolan was a good woman" - that makes sense. However, there isn't enough context to determine who exactly Phoolan is, so I switched it to A1, no context. It is important to tag articles for the right reason, since patent nonsense is rather insulting to potential new editors. Ego White Tray (talk) 13:32, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * cheers. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:37, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Zoogenetes article
Nice one FoCuS! Well done. Invertzoo (talk) 14:19, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * no worries! had a nice time looking for refs. remarkable creatures! sorry i've been quite busy of late. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi
Thanks Focusandlearn. yeah, i am new on editing and not getting it easily, I'll Need your help, thanks for your kindness. :)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Crandshaft (talk • contribs) 14:37, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * that looks delicious! no worries, let me know. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

rejection of my article
The content of my article is sourced from the person itself..i interviewed him few months ago..he is a kerala state award winner for best lyricist and has penned many notable and famous songs like 'chembaneer pooviruthu'..i'm a first time editor.I really like to know more about editing wikipedia articles and also like to know why u rejected my article. When u are free,please try to read my message and kind enough to reply back.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Measwinkumar (talk • contribs) 22:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * personal interviews are extremely discouraged. please see Conflict of interest, What Wikipedia is not and Referencing for beginners. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:43, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Proof of Heaven
I'm confused by the comments about the Proof of Heaven page. I've reviewed numerous Wikipedia pages that have no external refernces or links and are just very breif overviews about a person or event or the like. This is just essentially a write about a published book that is selling well on Amazon and other book sellers.

Can you please provide information as to why you believe it sounds like an advertisement, rather than just a writeup about a book and why it is necessary to have verifiablility when many other Wikipedia postings do not have them?

In fact, the page was modeled after the Eben Alexander, MD webpage, except that it's about the book and not the author.

Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proof of Heaven (talk • contribs) 21:47, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * i'd appreaciate a link to the article, as I can't recall much about it. yes, you can find unreferenced wikipedia pages, but that's precisely the point of following the AfC process: you get feedback from experienced editors, and one of the most important things about an article is that its subject needs to be verifiable and notable. i believe in your case, those criteria weren't met. it was a mere promotional article. please see Referencing for beginners. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:40, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Phinehas (band) page
Hey FoCuSandLeArN,

What do I need to do specifically in order to get this band's wiki page up and running? They are signed to a major label (Red Cord Records) and have a full length and an EP with that same label - do they need TWO full lengths in order to be notable? At the moment they are an up-and-coming band, but they are a big enough name where they will need a wiki page. They are touring nationally at the moment as well (They are CA native and are touring even through the midwest right now). They also have several music videos available for viewing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Phinehas_(band)

Just wondering if you had a specific for me in order to get this rolling! Thanks!

Myollinir (talk) 16:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

i've found a source that looks to be a real published source (Substream Music Press) - has physical copies issued, and had an article about the band - listed in my references on the page now

Myollinir (talk) 17:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Please read: Notability_(music). Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Refugee Protest Camp Vienna
Greetings, FoCuSandLeArN. I'm writing back about the article you declined. Your feedback was "This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia." The "single event" has been ongoing since November last year. It has made headlines at least weekly in all the Austrian newspapers and been featured on the television news. It inspired a right-wing counter-protest and was featured on campaign posters by the far-right Freedom Party. Furthermore, Austria's president, Heinz Fischer, and highest ranking church official, Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, have both been in personal contact with the refugees. I didn't get into this in the article, but the protest is related to ongoing events in Afghanistan and Pakistan. I provided an account of the protest at the article for the Votive Church, but that has now been removed: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Votive_Church,_Vienna&action=history: "The reference to the occupation of the church by asylumseekers - an unfortunate but minor event - took up a quarter (!) of the text." At the same time, there's a German language article on the protest that no-one seems to think is inappropriate: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugee_Protest_Camp_Vienna. Please advise how to proceed. Thanks. Yours, Toanke (talk) 07:39, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * please see: Notability (events) and News articles. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:36, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

thank you
I noticed you fixed some of my mistaken moves in AfC...or I should say Afc. {{{smiley}} Thanks! — rybec   21:02, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 21:20, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

and Cowboy Bebop
Hello: you placed the tag on Cowboy Bebop but then made no further edits. Per the template's documentation, I have now removed the tag. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa  (talk) 00:07, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Ralph Kot
Hi There,

I have question about my article about Ralph Kot. You said, that submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Rafal is fresh in public, so he's not such a "talked about" person in media. I'm from his close circle of friends, I wanted to make this article about him whitch he approved.

What I suppose to do to publish the article if there is no other reliable source than Ralph himself?

Have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ralphkot (talk • contribs) 13:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * unfortunately what you propose is unacceptable. see Notability. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:18, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Discourse on Unified Field reconciled with General Relativity
I have complied with external verification policy. I have put a message on the reviewers talk-p and one on my talk page. Please advise on my talk about what the next step would be. Thanks, oh, reviewer was Sphilbrick (talk | contribs) Regards --Jeffrey mcmahan (talk) 14:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * you won't be able to create that article. see Copyright violations. also, What Wikipedia is not. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:19, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

hi please help..
i want to publish an article which references are not there ( this article is about a person ( Playback singer in kannada industry ) . i have images and info regarding him. i have got that information from the Singer itself. how can i show wikipedia that these are all genuine ? please help.

(Sampath.ramkumar (talk) 04:59, 10 March 2013 (UTC))
 * those aren't acceptable references. please read Verifiability. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:23, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Denied wiki article.
Hi, I saw you reviewed my article for "Travis House (Producer)" - It says you declined due to lack of evidence. But all links provided are solid links showing evidence of my info and I check the "references for beginners" and can not figure out why this article was denied. Please help and explain what I can do to fix whatever is wrong with my publishing.


 * - Just noticed the comment stating he is "non-notiable" .... but when in reality I believe that is false, the man has produced for and worked with some of the top people in music, he has music all over Television and Film and is currently working with notable acts.... All my links and info prove this point.... What justify's a notable person?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinDRIP (talk • contribs) 07:34, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

- Justin — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinDRIP (talk • contribs) 07:27, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * a person has to be notable on his or her own right, not on account of somebody else. Notability is very clear on that. for a guide on what's considered appropriate referencing, refer to Verifiability, and for points about writing a wikipedia article about living persons, refer to Neutral point of view and Biographies of living persons. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:31, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Refugee Protest Camp Vienna
Hi, did you get my earlier messages? They seem to have disappeared or been removed. Toanke (talk) 13:37, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * User talk:FoCuSandLeArN/Archive 5. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:58, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Ah, I see my recent message is in Archive 5.

An update: I reinstated the info on refugees in the Votive Church article - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Votive_Church,_Vienna#Refugees - but would prefer to make a separate article about the Refugee Protest Camp, now that it has moved into the Servite Monastery and continues to make headlines in Vienna (today's unfortunate example was about a fight that two of the men got into, resulting in brief hospitalization for both: http://www.xn--sterreich-z7a.at/nachrichten/Pruegel-Orgie-unter-Asylwerbern/97414394)

Toanke (talk) 14:38, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * why don't you start a discussion at the Teahouse to see if you find consensus? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

2013 Donegal Senior Football Championship
Hi, I didn't understand your comment "upupandaway?" on the draft of the article. I intend to approve it. — rybec   23:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I was just mocking a sentence in that article. nothing more than my sense of humour. cheers! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 11:07, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Regarding User:Deven94
Good morning,

Regarding Deven94 and this proposal: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Dev_spears_(pure.uk)

You may wish to know that the user recently vandalised/inserted unconstructive edits to Hanley Castle High School both whilst logged in and also whilst logged out of WP.

I've been keeping an eye on his edits and have tried to revert ones that I am aware he has/had made unconstructive/vandalising edits to the project, though I may have missed a couple.

In regards to his proposal for the article, I believe that he is likely to have requested to create that article as a joke, or possibly just not understanding that WP doesn't accept biographies for people who are not 'significant' enough to be elegible for one in the opinion/view of WP (is that right?).

I know has was editing for a while from a college (currently IP blocked for vandalism - I've notified college admin) possibly as a prank on myself. In cases where I knew this had happened I did revert his edits and posted a note on the talk page where possible, though a couple of other users (possibly using bots) already placed a warning before I managed to work out how to post one. I'll keep an eye out for him for now.

Regards, Usual people in life (talk) 10:50, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * well yes, that article was simply not even going to be considered. seems like you have a good grip on the situation. it might be prudent to maybe request a block on that user. cheers, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 11:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Rejection of article "Yahuwah"
Please tell me why this article is not acceptable for WIKI. Cfc847 (talk) 14:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * hello. no in-line citations, inappropriate tone, and read like a personal reflection. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Rejection of Yahuwah article
With me being brand new at this, maybe you could give me some suggestions on how to meet these criteria. At the present I do not have a clue what you are talking about. Cfc847 (talk) 15:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * please see: Referencing for beginners, Neutral point of view and Writing better articles. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:03, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Denied article - Travis House (Producer)
I have read what you had suggested and I still do not understand where you are coming from I guess. The article was written with only facts and no fluff. Billboard Mag has mentioned him (Referenced) His name is on countless albums (Referenced) and is a vital part of what created these artists in the first place so many people could enjoy their music. He is the guy behind the scenes creating what you hear.

Not to sound like a brat but what does it take to get a Wikipedia if breaking into the music game with a major label artist and working with other major label artists is "nothing"?... I am just confused.\\

Sorry again but what do I need to do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinDRIP (talk • contribs) 21:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * i understand your frustration. it's a problem easily solved with proper referencing (full in-line citations from independent, reliable sources). please note that references must establish the notability of the subject, and if the subject is not notable in a stand-alone manner, then it's very likely that the subject can't be included on wikipedia. let me give you an example: a producer might seem notable because they've produced an elvis song, however that says nothing about the producer's notability, i.e. why is this particular producer notable; he might have changed the producing industry, perhaps. as i said before, if the producer is indeed notable, you'll have no problem in establishing that through referencing. cheers, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

another producer
Hi, I saw you reviewed my article for "Ill Slim Collin / Oliver S. Huehn" - It says you declined due to lack of evidence. But all links provided are solid links showing evidence of my info and I check the "references for beginners" and can not figure out why this article was denied. Please help and explain what I can do to fix whatever is wrong with my publishing. - Just noticed the comment stating he is "non-notiable" .... but when in reality I believe that is false, the man has produced for and worked with some of the top people in the music industry and all this artists on wikipedia too! — Preceding unsigned comment added by LA Angel 1 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * please read the above comment. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:19, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Ben Moore (Aritist)
I was wondering why my article on Ben Moore was rejected. The links I have included many are interviews with him by national newspapers and articles about him. I was wondering what more evidence do I need to support my claim before I re submit. As I have seen articles on much less note worthy individuals on hear. Ben is a big name in the London arts scene and his company art below has help many up and comming and contemporary artists get there work out there as well as causing quite a bit of controversy while he has been at it. Also the image of him as the pink stormtrooper did go viral if you do bother to go google it you will see pretty much every image of a pink stroomtrooper is him and there are many articles mentioning him. Yours Thom
 * hello there. please see Notability and Identifying reliable sources. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Ben Moore (Aritist)
I was wondering why my article on Ben Moore was rejected. The links I have included many are interviews with him by national newspapers and articles about him. I was wondering what more evidence do I need to support my claim before I re submit. As I have seen articles on much less note worthy individuals on hear. Ben is a big name in the London arts scene and his company art below has help many up and comming and contemporary artists get there work out there as well as causing quite a bit of controversy while he has been at it. Also the image of him as the pink stormtrooper did go viral if you do bother to go google it you will see pretty much every image of a pink stroomtrooper is him and there are many articles mentioning him. Yours Thom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Welovethom (talk • contribs) 11:10, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Joseph and his Dreams
Hi, thanks for your quick feedback on the article. I decided to merge just the last part (dreams as motif...) into the Joseph wiki article. Do you think what I have there is sufficient, or do you think it could be expanded upon? Sflax91 (talk) 18:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * i can't fully recall the entire draft but i think you can certainly add to the joseph article based on the dream bits you wrote. remember to keep it consistent with the existing article. good luck! i'm sure someone will review your edits, as that's an important article. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 18:27, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Never
Hi FoCuSandLeArN, I've been experiencing some issues with the creation of this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Never_Ever_Do_This_At_Home

I included references to support the article, but my revision was deleted for some reason (a result of my inexperience to be sure)

Understanding that you are under no obligation to help me, but could you please help me? References and support links below.

(Distributor) DRG Format (UK): http://www.drg.tv/ProgramDetails.aspx?ProgramDetail=12009 ROUGH TRANSLATION (Originator of Format) NRK (Norway): http://www.nrk.no/vitenskap-og-teknologi/1.7629123 Playback article: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/norwegian-format-never-ever-do-371127 (Official) Bellmedia press release (my name is on this release): http://bellmediapr.ca/discovery/releases/release.asp?id=15699&yyyy=2012

Insight Prod (talk) 15:49, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * hello there. the submission was deleted because it did not carry any references at the time. please see Referencing for beginners and add those citations to the article and submit it again. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

FYI
None of your AfC Reviews are showing up at: Shearonink (talk) 20:15, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * WikiProject Articles for creation/March 2013 Backlog Elimination Drive or on
 * WikiProject Articles for creation/March 2013 Backlog Elimination Drive/FoCuSandLeArN.
 * i was relying on the buddy. is it not working? i thought it just hadn't been tallied yet. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:28, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Shearonink (talk) 22:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Creation page Alain Kirili declined
Hi, I understand that you have declined the page for Alain Kirili because it was blank. There has been an error in saving the text. As suggested in the message that I received, I have clicked "edit" and removed the text above, then "saved". Will this article be resubmitted automatically? Thank you very much in advance for letting me know.Annaluka (talk) 19:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * i believe you need to click resubmit on the AfC template, not delete it. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:35, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your help. The page was successfully resubmitted and awaits review.Annaluka (talk) 01:19, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

villa
Dear FoCuSandLeArN,

I sincerely beg you to have a second look at this prospective submission:

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mónica Villa

Perhaps not being familiar with our environment and culture, you may not have noticed the true scope of accomplishment of actress Monica Villa. I will spot just a few things that may have passed overlooked:

1) one of a true artist's gifts is MODESTY, which is why she did not submit a life-size CV that would take long lists of names and dates that may say very little to a foreigner.

2) Monica Villa is the FIRST Argentine actor EVER to have obtained a Master's degree awarded by the University of Buenos Aires, a world renowned house of studies that produced talents of the statue of Nobel laureates César Milstein, Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, Luis Federico Leloir, Bernardo Houssay and Carlos Saavedra Lamas ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country ) and where, among many others, writer Jorge Luis Borges once taught Anglo-Saxon Literature. Her accomplishment sets a precedent that paves the way for future performing artists to imitate and is totally unprecedented in our country of more that 40 million inhabitants.

3) She was the ONLY ONE actor in the cast of "Waiting for the Hearse", an all time cult movie in the Spanish Speaking Americas and Spain, to be awarded an international prize (Huelva, Spain) shared with American Actor William Hurt, at the same level of relevance and peer competence.

4) In the Wikipedia's page dedicated to that movie five (5)other actors of the cast, not at all above her in terms of notability, have links to a biographical Wikipedia page. Villa is, at least, as accomplished as any of them, and rightfully deserving equal treatment. And this is surely an omission that must be redressed. Please see for yourself http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waiting_for_the_Hearse

5) Maintaining a dignified professional attitude in a most hostile environment, such as Argentina's, chronically corroded by flawed democracies and military interventions, is in itself a feat that deserves praise. So much so if the person involved embraces study as a means of self assertion and example for the younger, comparatively weaker generations.

I do ask you to reconsider this submission and offer myself to facilitate all other information that you may think is required.

Jorge Roca Jorgeroca (talk) 22:24, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * the Wikipedia notability guideline may be a bit different from what seems to be notable. please see Notability to understand what i meant. once the appropriate references are in place, feel free to resubmit the article. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xavier Toscano
Remember to check for CV. This is/was a direct copypaste from the "source" listed. Danger High voltage! 07:06, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * cheers, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:45, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

singer
Hi, we submitted page about singer Eduard Romanyuta today and got a rejection. Can you please let us know why is that? And how can we correct our mistakes? Thanks 777ideas (talk) 19:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * can you please tell me who that is? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your recent AfC review
Hi, you've placed a Declined review template on my talk page after you reviewed Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Schooling the World: The White Man's Last Burden but this is a mistake, it is not my draft. I only helped the actual article creator to fix a minor problem. The creator of the draft is User:Casenns. I'm not sure how to fix this. Roger (talk) 15:45, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * fixed. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Rejection of new musical in London
Hi, while I'm very impressed with your speed, I don't understand why you placed a rejection template in "The Perfect City", an article of a legit production of a new musical in London. Any pointers how to improve the article? Many thanks, --Phoniker (talk) 15:59, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * hello there. your submission was declined according to wikipedia's notability guidelines. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 18:01, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Response: Request For Reliable Sources On Fractal Art Composition
Hello FoCuSandLeArN,

I received the message you sent me on citing reliable sources.

I'm unable to do so because as far as I'm aware I'm the only one that is doing that type of fractal manipulations (It actually goes beyond that).

That's why I decided to start the wiki to get the word out and to provide a central place where people can go to answer the question that they have on how I create the images I do using fractal elements.

Besides my website xzendor7.com, my type of fractal artwork isn't being produced by anyone else.

I've looked around the net since I first started doing this about 2 years ago and I haven't found anyone else that does my kind of art.

If you chose to see what I mean the links below are the best examples to my digital art approach:

The Exploration Of Space

Brimitin Warrior

The Angel Wing Sword Of Arkledious Imperial Wings

Temple Of Golden Fire

The Throne Room

Xzendor7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xzendor7 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * i'm afraid that without extensive independent coverage from reliable sources the article won't be accepted. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 11:10, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Article of Sándor Tirpák
Dear FoCuSandLeArN!

Thank you for reviewing my Wikipedia article about Sándor Tirpák. I was sorry to read, that you didn’t find him a notable person as he is one of the best nature artist in Central-Europe both in oil paintings and porcelain painting and a recognized nature and bullfighting painter in Spain. I wanted to add pictures about his award winning works, but it seems that I still can’t add photos (Message of Wikipedia: Your account has not become confirmed yet.) I’m still working on the article before asking for a second review. Could you please give me some tips how it could work? I am new on Wikipedia.org so I would be pleased if you could help me.

Thank you in advance.

Jannamaria (talk) 12:59, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * he didn't fulfil the notability guideline, which is detailed here: Notability. to be confirmed you have to make a few edits on wiki, which you can easily do in a few minutes. regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:15, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Nicholls Baronetcy
I see you accepted this article a few months ago. It is, in fact, nonsense. Lord Harmar-Nicholls was in fact created a baronet in 1964, as the article states, but all actual sources indicate that the title became extinct upon his death in 2000. Brothers and nephews do not, in fact, get to petition for special privilege to succeed to baronetcies. Since you approved it, the article actually metastasized and became much more ridiculous, with imaginary titles going back several centuries, connections to royalty, and so on and so forth. I've turned it into a redirect to Harmar Nicholls, but perhaps it should be deleted entirely. The lesson, I guess, is to be careful about approving articles without checking out the details. john k (talk) 13:52, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * These things happen regularly. I read an article a few weeks ago in the signpost that mentioned a very extensive non-factual Portuguese invasion somewhere. It took editors something like 5 years to notice, so thank you for doing so! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:01, 20 March 2013 (UTC)