User talk:Focamik

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 01:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your updates to Veteran tickets foundation. I've fixed some of the wiki-text formatting. When you add internal links, you can just do it with this format: Article name here rather than putting the full wikipedia path. The former method is preferred because it is more extensible, less cluttered, and also allows mirrors to easily reformat links appropriately. I also removed the link to the foundation's website from the lead as per the WP:Manual of Style, and because it's already included at the end as the "Official site".


 * And while I appreciate that you've given an explanation for the removal of the notability tag, I don't think the article doesn't appear to have any real coverage outside of the Phoenix area, and a paper's widespread circulation isn't enough to make it notable. I don't think it should be nominated for deletion at this time, so instead, I've put the tag on there to alert other users that the article may need additional sources. It does not hurt the article to have the tag on there, and it adds it to categories so other editors can find the article to improve it. After the tag has subsisted for a while, or national coverage is obvious, it can be removed. In the meantime, the tag is certainly not meant to be dispariging in any way.


 * I've added a welcome notice after this message because it has links to the Wikiformatting markup language (for adding links and images, etc.) as well as other helpful wikipedia links. Thanks. Shadowjams (talk) 20:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:VTF 72dpiRGBLogo0708.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:VTF 72dpiRGBLogo0708.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 20:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WikiVTFLogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WikiVTFLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 19 April 2021 (UTC)