User talk:Fockthepusseehard

March 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Are you a human or a bot (sorry, I'm new). How can you prove you are human? Can you tell me who Spiderman fought in the final episode of the animated series to prove you're human? Fockthepusseehard (talk) 10:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Viking metal. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   11:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Norse religion, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Norse religion was changed by Fockthepusseehard (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889702 on 2017-03-01T11:01:25+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   11:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Of course, I appeal my block. You blocked me because of bigotry. Just because my ideas are different doesn't mean they are wrong or invalid. Furthermore, I still don't know if you're a bot.Fockthepusseehard (talk) 11:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Fockthepusseehard/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David. moreno 72   11:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)