User talk:Foldedpaper

Hi Foldedpaper, welcome to wikipedia. I think you are hoping to use wikipedia to tell the world about Whymandesign.com. Unfortunately wikipedia isn't a promotional vehicle, and people and companies require a quite high degree of success or importance before wikipedia accepts articles on them. You may find Yellowikis more hospitable. Kappa 11:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Ugcunion
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ugcunion, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.openplans.org/projects/ugcunion. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ugcunion, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Ugcunion appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ugcunion has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ugcunion and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ugcunion with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ugcunion.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Guest9999 (talk) 17:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Ugcunion
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ugcunion, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.openplans.org/projects/ugcunion. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ugcunion
A tag has been placed on Ugcunion, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Nk.sheridan    Talk  17:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I didn't want you to think that your comments had been ignored. There are so many problems with this content that we just can't keep it in its present state, and I doubt we will be able to retain it in most other states.  Your assertion of copyright needs to fall within the guidelines found at WP:COPYRIGHT in order to be useful -- it's not enough just to say that you have the right to publish the material, because Wikipedia could end up in serious legal trouble if we accepted all such claims.  The other major problem that I noted was that the material didn't have any reliable sources -- independent, arm's-length, third-party expert sources -- that asserted the notability of the website in question in a verifiable way.  Those principles are cornerstones of every article in Wikipedia and articles that don't have them are quickly deleted.  I hope this helps you understand further -- you might also refer to WP:Why was my article deleted? and WP:Your first article for more hints and guidelines.  If you have any questions about Wikipedia policy, you can leave me a note.  Accounting4Taste: talk 17:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)