User talk:FooManChu55

I've added the "prod" template to the article Oprius Software, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Oprius Software. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages-- it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. -FisherQueen 20:27, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

I admit that I am new to the Wikipedia, and the original post wasn't great. After reading the Wikipedia's Notability page I changed the focus to an example of a TurboGears project, and a valuable tool. I also read through Notability_(software) and the article meets the guidelines. We have been sourced by a number of websites (and blogs) but I did not post this information as I felt it was more advertising and took away value from the article itself. If you want these sources then I can provide them to you. Also, since the software is a great example of TurboGearsit is notable in that is shows how far you can take the TurboGearswidgets. Kevin, the founder of TurboGears, himself has given Oprius much acclaim. I believe that this article provides value to readers, and the wikipedia in general. Obviously I am missing something as you feel it is not worthy of the Wikipedia. I would like to work with you on this.
 * To try to resolve this problem, I put the article up for, which basically means that people give their input. You'll see a link on the page now, and I encourage you to click on it and speak your case. Please keep in mind that admins pay a lot of attention to guidelines; WP:WEB, for example. -Patstuart 03:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:OpriusLogo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:OpriusLogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)