User talk:Foobarnix/Archive 6

Moral Mondays
Thanks for taking an interest in the article! If you happen to be in the area, we could always use another appropriately licensed picture or two. Cheers, a13ean (talk) 18:34, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

The Other Place
Well, thanks to you as well! Really, you did the hard work, the plot is the hardest part of any play/musical for me, but also, I think, the most important! The only thing I might add now are some comments by White on the play, the link to a good interview is in his article. (Won't get to that for a few days, maybe this weekend.) Again, I appreciate that you started this nice article.Flami72 (talk) 11:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

CFD
Hi Foobarnix -- I'm recommending that we "listify" the category you created at Category:Winner of AAAS Prize for Behavioral Science Research. In general, award winner categories are generally not very sustainable or easily maintainable; and lists do a better job of capturing this information. Categories are best-reserved just for the most "defining" attributes of individuals; not treated as meta-tags. See WP:OCAT for more info, or please feel free to drop me a line to talk. And, of course, please feel free to weigh in at the CFD discussion. --Lquilter (talk) 23:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Recreational mathematics experts
Category:Recreational mathematics experts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 00:08, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The DuPont Show of the Week, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeremy Brett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Affairs of the Heart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Philippe Clair


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Philippe Clair requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aerospeed (Talk) 20:29, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russ Bellant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Simpson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Macou stamp featuring geometric magic square.jpg
Dear Ronhjones - Thank you for intervening on the copyright question regarding the.

As I have written on the talk page for that file, I did indeed mistakenly upload the wrong file. I have now fixed it. User JohnBlackburne still objects, saying that a photocopy of a stamp is still covered by copyright. Is he right? You can see more discussion here.

The OTRS people have given the file a ticket number (ticket #2014110610024051). I thought that settled it.

I just hate to get involved in an email correspondence spanning three continents. OTH the people at the Macau Post Office have evidently told Lee Sallows that they are eager to cooperate. If I must, I must.--Foobarnix (talk) 18:08, 15 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The stamp has the copyright. It does not matter if the image is a scan or a photo, that just makes it a derivative of the stamp, and the copyright still exists. I've also seen the OTRS ticket (I have many heads...). Since Lee Sallows name is on the stamp and the images are on his web site, it's been passed. The question is who owns the copyright - Lee Sallows or Macau Post Office? If the latter, then we do really need an e-mail from them (ideally using the same form Email templates/Consent. Ron h jones (Talk) 18:41, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Toploftical
Given, might I inquire if there is any connection between your accounts? —Ruud 21:29, 8 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I'd be willing to continue this discussion offline, but you don't seem to have e-mail enabled. You can probably find my mail address from my user page if you are interested, otherwise I'll probably consider this as case closed. —Ruud 22:21, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexandre Borovik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Message alert
This is to alert you to the fact that I posted a message on your talkpage on the Dutch Wikipedia. Feel free to remove this alert at any time. Richard 10:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Related to the Univalent Foundations page
Hi, I am Vladimir Voevodsky. Could you please explain what is it that makes you to remove the material that I create for the articles on Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations? There is nothing in the text on the Univalent Foundations page that is incorrect or too technical (compare it for example with the text at the page for the Martin-Lof Type Theory). If you wish I can give you many more examples of pages whose subjects concern questions mathematical that are more technical than anything at the UF page.

There is also nothing wrong with a text on a page being written by someone who is a specialist or even a creator of the subject that the page is about. If you look at famous encyclopedias such as encyclopedia Britannica you will see that the articles are written by known specialists in the corresponding fields. The Wikipedia is open so that everybody can add, correct or improve an article but contributions from specialists are highly valuable and important for the Wikipedia to be a useful and informative source of knowledge.

Please stop warring with me and if you want to contribute then contribute by adding substantial, verifiable and informative content. --Vladimirias (talk) 04:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)