User talk:Foobaz/Archive 2

Thanks
for reverting the vandalism, and for saying you liked my Wikiessays. I plan to write some more... if you see my user page.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 18:32, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Which ones did you like best?-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 18:34, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, you can leave comments on the talk pages for the essays, for suggestions for how they could be improved, or how they relate to WP:PAG.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 19:16, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Happy 1st edit day
 Pat Politics rule!  20:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Fixed VV Cephei A
Hi there!

I took the liberty of fixing your image image:Sun_and_VV_Cephei_A.svg, which was listed as having a librsvg bug on Commons. I made a new version in Inkscape and clipped the big circle (orange) to the edge of the board using a sqaure the same the same size of the board and the path "intersection" tool. The Sun is now 3px wide and VV Cephei A is 5700px wide (before the clip), and the image as whole is a nice round 400px square.

⇒Inductiveload] 11:40, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

CopyNight Orlando
Hi ! I see you're from Florida. If you're in the Orlando area, please check out this brief survey. I'm looking to start a meet-up of CopyNight, a monthly social discussion of copyright and related issues (like Wikipedia, Creative Commons, and open source). If that sounds neat, please answer this short survey to help with scheduling the event. Thanks! --Gavin Baker 10:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Baseball metaphors for sex
Man, give me a break. Look at that page, and tell me what I added wasn't a totally valid change. By the way, my edit wasn't a neologism, more a protologism. But what is language if it does not evolve? The truth of my metaphorical use of "ground rule double" is self-evident. Furthermore, it is a quality contribution to Wikipedia. It is my belief that you have deprived a great number of people of a life-enriching read; I suppose eventually history will judge who was right, and who was the cyber-terrorist. I wish you no ground rule doubles anytime in the future. -- Ndclimber (talk) 00:09, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Had a good laugh did you?!? Then my goal was accomplished :) -- Ndclimber (talk) 06:39, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

SmackBot and links
SmackBot broke some links at Apple TV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Foobaz (talk • contribs) 16:50, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, problem should not happen again (from SmackBot) (but let me know if it does): WP:AWB bug logged. Rich Farmbrough, 16:24 5 February 2008 (GMT).

The Baptism of Christ
I removed that section for two reasons: there's nothing else in the article (or in the quick Google search I did) saying the painting ever made it to Dresden, and the work you cited is a work of fiction. If the information is true, I suggest finding a better source. —Mira 00:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Please don't remove my talk page comments
Please don't remove my talk page comments, like you did at Talk:Church of Scientology. Yes, I agree that off-topic discussion is not appropriate, but when my comment only consisted of "see this other user's previous comment" it's not appropriate to summarily remove another user's comment. Cirt (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ViolaWWW.png
Thanks for uploading Image:ViolaWWW.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Userpage vandalism
No prob. Hope you are doing well. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 15:27, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Dates
See WP:dates Retaining the existing format If an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the whole article should conform to that variety, unless there are reasons for changing it on the basis of strong national ties to the topic.

In the early stages of writing an article, the format chosen by the first major contributor to the article should be used, unless there is reason to change it on the basis of strong national ties to the topic. Where an article that is not a stub shows no clear sign of which format is used, the first person to insert a date is equivalent to the first major contributor.

Since I did not want to search for who made what/when. I just changed the date to U.S. date format, and conform the article with the format of all of the other majority of dates within the article.

Hmmm, preferences, what I choose for preferences is my choice. Thank You. pete 16:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Request for Rollback
I've granted your request for rollback. Happy editing! Pedro : Chat  14:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Next Computer?
Hi, wondering why you changed the redirect. As mentioned in the edit summary, the company was never called just "Next Computer", but there was a computer called the "Next Computer."

Also, if someone lands on the article about the computer when they really wanted the company, there's a link to the company in the first sentence of the lede. If someone lands on the article about the company when they really wanted the computer, the link to the computer is a little harder to find (not impossible -- it's in the infobox -- just a bit harder).

I think the redirect is much more functional if it goes to the thing actually named "Next Computer" (the computer) rather than the company. Thanks, NapoliRoma (talk) 20:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * (you wrote:) I redirected Next Computer to NeXT because that's what I was looking for when I searched for it. NeXT made more than one type of computer, so Next Computer can refer to any one of them. But there was only one NeXT Computer, Inc. I believe the latter is what most people hitting the redirect will be looking for.


 * As you will -- I can see it going either way. Strictly speaking, the company was never named "Next Computer" (although its full name was originally Next Computer, Inc.), and there was one specific computer model formally named the "Next Computer", but clearly there's an existence proof for people thinking of the company as "Next Computer", so although not optimal to my mind, it's not a far-fetched place to have the redirect point.  Regards, NapoliRoma (talk) 21:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Scientology
Your vandalistic deletion of the external link I added has now been reverted with bells. Can't thetans take criticism? Albatross2147 (talk) 02:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Nothing in the link changed. It was probably your connection channelling or whatever Albatross2147 (talk) 06:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Seven Seas
In your early edits to the article Seven Seas, you said they included the Mediterranean Sea and the Black Sea, but not the Aegean Sea. Why would that be? It seems strange. Also, the Aegean Sea is included in this picture that you made of the seven seas: Image:Seven_seas.png What's the deal with that? - Shaheenjim (talk) 07:49, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok. Note that I edited the Seven Seas article partly in response to your answer to the above question.  Also note Talk:Marginal_sea. - Shaheenjim (talk) 02:46, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Map help
Hello there, first of all I want to thank you for all your contributions and dedication to make wikipedia a better encyclopedia. Your Map work is very constructive and it helps user to understand better. Well, I saw this map at the hi5 (website) page, I would like you to create a similar map to this page i'minlikewithyou, let me know if you can do it to give you the information needed. Thank you iDosh!  talk?  22:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Wikipedia:O
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 05:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

capitalization of marsupial common names
Please see WP:MaM on this issue. The WikiProject says we should use capitals. You put both the Koala and Giant Koala articles out of alignment with the Project. I have reverted you. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

City template
I was protecting all the templates used in Ted Stevens, which is now a very high-visibility page because he was just indicted. We've had a recent history of people changing templates on high-vis articles to Goatse and the like. I fixed the city template and reduced to semiprotection. Please let me know if I need to fix anything else. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 20:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Meetup
Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 14:28, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Others' Rules of Life section
Currently you have the link to your dad's rules as: http://www.hoglaw1.com/rules/ but I think you meant to put: http://www.hoglaw1.com/rules.htm. This is not a criticism in any way/shape/form, just thought you might want to fix the link. Have a good day :) and feel free to remove this comment if you wish. (D.c.camero (talk) 18:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC))

Meetup
Meetup/Gainesville, Florida - in the planning stages, if you're interested. :) --Ebyabe (talk) 15:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Seven Seas 2 (Eight Seas?)
Note today's update to Talk:Seven_Seas. - Shaheenjim (talk) 04:17, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Fraser with Kerr.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fraser with Kerr.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:50, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Air-Premiers Symptômes.jpeg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Air-Premiers Symptômes.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pais (talk) 16:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Bebta
thumb|right|400px|this is a bebta release???????????

"Warning: this is a bebta release"... a Google search brought up nothing for the search "this is a bebta realese"; that has got to be a spelling error. Daniel Christensen (talk) 16:15, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Pretty sure it's supposed to be beta...Daniel Christensen (talk) 16:15, 16 October 2009 (UTC) If that's a synthesized/ported/emulation of the browser then it is inapproproiate; like if a Harvard student remade it for a demonstration which would account for the general spelling error. Daniel Christensen (talk) 16:16, 16 October 2009 (UTC)


 * So that was really a syntax error in the program; so every one had that? Daniel Christensen (talk) 17:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Just seems unlikely; especially since it was even an Italics word it would receive special attention and be less likely to be overlooked. Daniel Christensen (talk) 17:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

And lol; as far as proper Wikipedidanness; I am far form it; look at my articles; discussions; general defiance and all that. Daniel Christensen (talk) 17:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chess_position
Template:Chess_position has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. SunCreator (talk) 00:29, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikifier
I recently made the switch to Colloquy, and was giving your Wikifier plugin a go, but truth be told I can't get it to work. I imagine it's a bit out of date, is that the likely reason? ~ Amory ( u •  t  •  c ) 14:57, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Hurricane Charley on Florida Weather Radar.mov listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hurricane Charley on Florida Weather Radar.mov, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 16:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

FYI
Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Sciologos. You have been involved with this issue in the past, perhaps you could help with investigation. -- Cirt (talk) 19:49, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. -- &oelig; &trade; 00:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Flight that Fought Back (DVD cover).png
 Thanks for uploading File:The Flight that Fought Back (DVD cover).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:07, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Rogue Amoeba Ammo.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rogue Amoeba Ammo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:30, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Congrats
Professor used it today in class, thought you'd like to know how far your work has spread. PhnomPencil (✉) 16:30, 10 September 2012 (UTC)