User talk:Foolishservant

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Leaders Fellowship (February 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christian Leaders Fellowship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Christian Leaders Fellowship, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Christian_Leaders_Fellowship Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Christian_Leaders_Fellowship reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 10:22, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Leaders Fellowship (February 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christian Leaders Fellowship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Christian Leaders Fellowship, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Christian_Leaders_Fellowship Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Christian_Leaders_Fellowship reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:52, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Christian Leaders Fellowship


A tag has been placed on Draft:Christian Leaders Fellowship, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Ock Soo Park
Hello Foolishservant, thank you for your message on my user talk page.

When you said "I will assume responsibilities for the changes to the page for Ock Soo Park", it sounds as if you are under the impression that Wikipedia articles have people who have some kind of main responsibility for updating them. That is not the case – almost all articles are open for editing by almost anybody and no editor owns an article.

However, the "anybody can edit" principle does come with a responsibility: nobody may edit in a way that goes against Wikipedia's policies. PhilemonYoo's edits were almost entirely unacceptable as they were written from the point of view of Yoo's organisation, with a lot of promotional content and unsourced details. Please note that Wikipedia is, in general, not concerned with what a person says about themselves, only what other people who are unconnected with them has published about them – and those are the publications that should be used to support the information in Wikipedia.

If PhilemonYoo had taken the time to read the information posted to their user talk page, they would have seen that as a volunteer within Park's organisation who edited Wikipedia as part of their volunteer duties, they fall squarely within what is defined as a paid editor. Unfortunately they never made any effort to make the mandatory disclosure which means that they violated an important Wikipedia policy. There are other policies connected with having a conflict of interest, and I will post some pointers about that below. Please read those, and follow the instructions (especially as concerns not editing the article directly but only posting edit requests to the article's talk page). Note that the blue links lead to important information pages. If you are editing Wikipedia in order to spread the fame of a person, you do have a conflict of interest and are expected to edit within those guidelines.

I hope this makes sense. Your efforts to work within Wikipedia's policies is appreciated. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 08:01, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Another point I forgot to address: you said "We are by no means professional editors and would appreciate your guidance." Nobody is a professional editor here. We are all volunteers, doing this in our free time as and when we feel like doing so. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 08:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Foolishservant. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Ock Soo Park, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 08:01, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Foolishservant/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Foolishservant/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. bonadea contributions talk 09:26, 23 May 2020 (UTC)