User talk:Football fan 109

GSA & Smethwick Town
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article GSA & Smethwick Town, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of GSA & Smethwick Town. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Shipston Excelsior
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shipston Excelsior, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Shipston Excelsior. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Shipston Excelsior
A fellow Wikipedian had proposed that the article Shipston Excelsior be deleted from Wikipedia, but I noticed that you have removed the tag from the article. Common procedure in such cases is to move the article to a regular deletion discussion, where the community will assess whether the subject meets Wikipedia's guidelines and criteria. I have started such a discussion at Articles for deletion/Shipston Excelsior. You are invited to join. A ecis Brievenbus 00:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Shipston Excelsior
An editor has nominated Shipston Excelsior, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)