User talk:Footballeditor3

AFC East
Please do not add "the current champion is". See WP:NOTNEWS - Wikipedia is not a current news journal, any edits you make should make sense next year, and ten years later. "The current" is one of the phrases which is almost always incorrect in Wikipedia. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 00:16, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Welcome Footballeditor3! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are registered editors!

Hello, Footballeditor3. Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

 Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 22:19, 2 February 2019 (UTC)  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:WelcomeVisual/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

February 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Tom Brady. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 12:51, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Molly Qerim— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Stephen A. Smith. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at T-Series (company), you may be blocked from editing. Everedux (talk) 01:55, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * During the next 72 hours, decide whether or not you want to be a productive enyclopedia editor. You will not be allowed to continue with your disruption of the encyclopedia. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  02:19, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Tom Brady
I ageee with you that the article should say Brady is the greatest but you’re going to get blocked for edit warring if you don’t stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmorrow151 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Tom Brady, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please read WP:NPOV Tarl N. ( discuss ) 23:52, 18 March 2019 (UTC)