User talk:Footballwhizz

Cai Carney Media
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cai Carney Media is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cai Carney Media until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 23:55, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Cai Carney Media. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.— cyberbot I NotifyOnline 06:08, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Third party sources
I'm not sure that the principal of your school counts as an independent third party source - there needs to be clear water between the person making the statement and whatever's been set up. If he approved the group then for notability discussions he counts as a part of that group - there needs to be actual clear water between you and whoever you are citing. The full criterion is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Your quoted comment fits none of the above - a sentence isn't significant coverage, a reliable source is something like a book or a newspaper, you only have one source, and he's too close to you to qualify as independent. Neonchameleon (talk) 21:25, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Talking is what talk pages are for
So no, not annoying. And we all have to start somewhere. Dealing with the basics, most deletion discussions are closed in a week - and you can recover pages through wp:REFUND or by asking the deleting admin if you find evidence that they are notable that wasn't mentioned in the deletion discussion (either because it didn't exist then or just wasn't mentioned). To pass the deletion review you're going to need something about your club in a couple of local newspapers (high school ones don't count) - it has to be more than a line, has to be not written by one of you, and has to deal with the club itself rather than what the club does (so you can't say that you reviewed something is evidence of notability). If it expands, and later gets the articles I mentioned, that's fine - but "looking to expand" is covered by wp:CRYSTAL as not being enough. Good luck - very few high school clubs are notable by Wikipedia standards (which boil down to "Is someone who doesn't know anyone even peripherally involved ever likely to want to look this up?") and I'll be delighted to see one that is. Neonchameleon (talk) 21:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Cai Carney Media. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.— cyberbot I NotifyOnline 22:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cai Carney Media


A tag has been placed on Cai Carney Media, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Footballwhizz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cai Carney Media, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! John from Idegon (talk) 18:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Princeton Community High School
Hi. I am glad to see you are interested in school articles. I watch and edit a couple thousand of them, but I started with my own alma mater, in Indiana, Hobart High School (Indiana). When I started editing, I did not realize there were rules as to what you could put in different types of articles. The guideline for high school articles is found at WP:SCH/AG. No-one doubts the truthfulness of your additions, they are just not the kind of content that we include. If I can be of any help to you, feel free to drop me a note on my talk page. John from Idegon (talk) 18:46, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Death of Daryl Robinson


A tag has been placed on Death of Daryl Robinson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. John from Idegon (talk) 21:18, 7 February 2014 (UTC)