User talk:Footmath

February 2014
Hello, I'm Abce2. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Quintic function without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Abce2 (talk) 17:33, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Quintic function, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anita5192 (talk) 18:26, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Solve quintic equation in general form


A tag has been placed on Solve quintic equation in general form, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nathan121212 (talk) 20:07, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Quintic function with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 21:19, 21 May 2014 (UTC)