User talk:For Patty

August 2013
Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Camilla Hall because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nancy Ling Perry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Angela Atwood, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Angela Atwood was changed by For Patty (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860797 on 2013-08-28T09:54:53+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Sara Jane Olson. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 09:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 10:20, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

A message for you
Have a look once your block expires. Please ensure you use Reliable sources. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC) Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)