User talk:Forbes707

Welcome
Hello, Forbes707, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! RadioFan (talk) 16:06, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hornby School
I've removed the reference you listed on this article as it does not meet Wikipedia's verifiability criteria.--RadioFan (talk) 16:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I've removed this 3 times now, please review WP:V for information on what is considered a verifiable reference. Listing an individual name is not sufficient.--RadioFan (talk) 16:22, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * So, when I have taken a tour and spoken with the board of directors of the institution I can't use this primary source as a reference? We teach children the importance of primary sources but are not allowed to use them ourselves?  Instead I had to go hunt down semi-correct online references to satisfy the wikipedia community.  OK...I found some vague resources online that had similar information.  I hope this is now sufficient. --Forbes707 (talk) 16:40, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Forbes707
 * No, a conversation you had with someone close to the organization is not a verifiable reference. Primary sources are fine for research but not for a collaborative encyclopedia like Wikipedia.  If the references you find are "semi-correct" then dont use them.  If the subject is notable, then certainly someone has written something about it somewhere, in a book, in the local newspaper, perhaps state archives?  If this building is on the national registry, I would think that got mentioned in the local newspaper.   Has this organization published a history of the building?  Depending on its format, that might be passable as a reliable source.--RadioFan (talk) 16:45, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. RadioFan (talk) 16:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)