User talk:ForensicReapers

Speedy deletion nomination of The Exercise Ball Incident


A tag has been placed on The Exercise Ball Incident requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 06:12, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Exercise Ball Incident


The article The Exercise Ball Incident has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Notability concerns, no reliable sources, unlikely to be notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ymblanter (talk) 10:08, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

BLP discretionary sanctions notice
Johnuniq (talk) 05:43, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Onision
Why did you add "Jackson has expressed his amorous affairs with preadolescent girls." at Onision: diff? The first problem is that the English is not quite right. The major problem is that suggestions like that on a WP:BLP article must be referenced with a reliable source. I have not examined the article and have no opinion on the substance of the issue but repeating unreferenced edits like that will lead to sanctions. Johnuniq (talk) 05:44, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * For reference, while already brought up that concern, I saw the same thing and was going to raise the same one. Please carefully review our biographies of living persons policy prior to editing any more biographies. Such a statement in a BLP would require absolutely impeccable sourcing from the most highly reliable of sources. Making such an edit without a reference at all is absolutely unacceptable. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Jeffrey Epstein. Elizium23 (talk) 05:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dennis Bergkamp, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 07:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop introducing deliberate factual errors
Hi there. Introducing deliberate factual errors is lame. Please stop. Robby.is.on (talk) 07:46, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert
Firefangledfeathers (talk) 17:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Please also be aware that Jeffrey Epstein is under a consensus required restriction, and you should not reinstate challenged edits without building consensus. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 17:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Hell Awaits, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you.  Rob van  vee  08:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm LaundryPizza03. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Spic, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 19:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

April 2024
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jeffrey Epstein, you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * See, today, Special:Diff/1224882351 (a true statement, but given the Epstein edit you warned for, hard to assume good faith). See also this, also about Epstein, in 2021 (warned by Firefangledfeathers) and this blatant racist vandalism a bit before that. This seems like a racist POV-pushing account that has somehow flown beneath the radar for years. Hoping one or both of you can put an end to that and maybe also look through their contribs for any lurking stealth vandalism. At a minimum, could use a G3. --  Tamzin  &#91;cetacean needed&#93; (they&#124;xe) 04:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I must not have blocked the account then and there because I'm so nice. They're WP:NOTHERE. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Negro-Yemenis


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Negro-Yemenis, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)