User talk:Forestlicious

June 2009
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Acalamari 16:03, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Then it should be noted that every Pussycat Doll alias is unreferenced, then it should be edited. I tried to find reliable sources, but it easily recognized as "fansite". As you know, fansites rely on facts. If you want to know about their alias name, just ask themselves. They always introduce themselves in every show, and they usually use their Doll name.

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Saiyuki: Journey West, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yang Jian, Ne Zha and Wen Zhong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Jean Grey

 * Jean Grey

Per WP:BRD, you've been Bold, someone else (many someone else's) have Reverted. Now is the time for Discussion on the talk page. In this case, at talk:Jean Grey.

You have apparently been engaging in tendentious editing.

Please be aware if you continue along the same path, you may be blocked to avoid further disruption.

I entreat you to please take the time to discuss your ideas/additions. - jc37 20:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Jean Grey. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:45, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Calling a fictional character "real" is into vandalism territory, and you're edit-warring. Please stop.   Acroterion   (talk)   02:46, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and sock puppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.


 * Blocked for 72 hours. Making another account (in this case User:PhoenixForce5) to "help" push your POV is a good way to get yourself indefinitely blocked. - jc37 14:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited List of The Super Hero Squad Show episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lockheed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)