User talk:Forestofthedead/Archive 1

Deo Volente
Are you from Indonesia? Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 05:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Tagging
In the future, please consider using appropriate criteria when tagging images for deletion. If there is no appropriate criteria, please consider listing the image at files for deletion. Thank you. TN X Man 01:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

I marked three pictures posted by potential pedophiles as needed to be speedily deleted. A day or so ago I marked a picture for a similar reason as needed to be speedily deleted and it was deleted. I do not know why you reverted my deletion labels. If the criteria worked to getting one picture deleted I do not know why it wouldn't work for others. Pictures posted of children by pedophiles should be immediately deleted. They have been on Wikipedia for months, and them being on here for even a minute is too long.

Bigpindahouse (talk) 08:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't see evidence where the users who uploaded the pictures were considered pedophiles. However, I may have missed something. Could you point me to those discussions? Either way, I think the images would be better discussed at FFd. If you would like to nominate them, I could help you with the process. TN X Man  11:34, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

User Csteel0224 has made some changes to Wikipedia articles.

He edited the article pudding to include the sentence "Some people wrestle in chocolate pudding at college parties, etc." He also edited the article on mud and addeded a picture involving kids and mud. He edited the article underwear to include the sentence: "Sometimes it may be used as bathing attire. It also may be used for mudbathing,wrestling,and pudding wrestling."

Notably he edited the article wetlook, an article about a sexual fetish, to include a picture involving kids and water, completely out of place on article like that.

The edits to articles about messy substances and especially the article editing of wetlook indicate the user has a wet and messy fetish.

Now I would not care if he was into this fetish if his interest was in adults, but all the images he has uploaded and placed on articles are of minors. It is my belief that his edit history and the kinds of pictures he has uploaded (see his talk page for names of pics he's uploaded that got deleted) point to this user being a pedophile.

As for user Guyonsticks, first off he uploaded a picture of a teen being covered in slime that was a screen cap from a youtube video that could be seen as a fetish video. That picture was deleted. The fact that he uploaded a picture from such a video means the picture of a wet kid he uploaded, may also be related to his sexual preferences. He does a lot of edits to articles involving water which when looked it in connection to the slime picture seems to indicate that he also has a wet and messy fetish which again I don't condemn except when it involves minors.

If you know what your looking for you can discern the age preference and sexual fetish of these two individuals. I feel that any pictures put up by them of minors should be deleted. If similar pictures are needed they should be put up by someone else.

Help with nominating the pictures for deletion would be appreciated.

Bigpindahouse (talk) 22:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The page on which you would need to list the images is Files for deletion. There are three steps, which, while explained in more detail on the page, boil down to 1) tagging the image 2) creating the discussion page and 3) notifying the author. Also, I would mention the Wikipedia notion of assuming good faith, as it may get mentioned in the discussion. I know you've been here a while and have probably heard of it, but thought it warranted mention. Let me know if you need further assistance. TN X Man  02:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)