User talk:Forgot to put name/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, Forgot to put name, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Ekabhishektalk 05:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Disambiguation link notification for November 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hindustan Ke Hunarbaaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IST (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Mumbai
Hi Forgot to put name, I saw in your Userpage that you hail from Mumbai. I felt WikiProject Mumbai should be of your interest. Other then that, we also conduct monthly meetups for Wikipedians in Mumbai. We have about 15-20 active editors from Mumbai, who meet, have discussion, plan some events, etc to build the encyclopedia in India, and increase Mumbai related contents. Thanks. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 12:45, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Death of Bal Thackeray for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Bal Thackeray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Death of Bal Thackeray until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:08, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

List of Indian castes
Hi, I've reverted your contributions at List of Indian castes. Please could you take a read of WP:Citing sources. I know that you might think it is a pain but each and every one of the items in the list will need to be sourced and, furthermore, you probably should read the deletion discussion because there are numerous points made therein which will massively impact upon what sources are ok to cite. Sorry about this. - Sitush (talk) 10:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I realise that you self-reverted this but just in case you are still unsure, this is not a WP:OVERLINK problem. Overlinks are when, for example, someone writes in an article that * - "X is a place in India. Some more stuff here. It is the biggest town in India". You see, as a usual rule we only link to another article once in the text of the article that you are editing, and that is usually on the first occurrence of the term. The above example should read: * - "X is a place in India. Some more stuff here. It is the biggest town in India". However, citations are not links in the sense that WP:OVERLINK means: we can cite one source many, many times in an article and all is ok. Well, all is ok if the citation is valid, ie: reliable etc! I know that you've also now contributed to the deletion discussion but it seems very likely that you have not in fact read what people had already said and two people have already remarked on this. If you read the full discussion then you might come to understand why the source that you did provide is not likely to do the job that you hoped it would do. - Sitush (talk) 12:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Death of Bal Thackeray, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aurangabad and Raigad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Chess.com
Hello, just letting you know I removed the prod from the above article as it was previously proposed for deletion. Thank you. Rotten regard 00:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

I don't think the article was proposed for deletion, anyway, I formally nominated it for deletion here: Articles_for_deletion/Chess.com. This is a formal discussion so we should have no problems with it being removed. Please contribute. OGBranniff (talk) 06:05, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Help needed
I would like to know what is a WP:COATRACK article?. I found the essay very confusing. Forgot to put name (talk) 19:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi there. A coatrack article is an article which is written about one thing, but most of the content is actually about something else.
 * Let's imagine, for example, that someone made an article about you, containing nothing but lots of nasty insults and criticisms of you. This wouldn't be allowed and the article would be deleted. Let's then say that the same person created an article about the school you went to, but most of that article just talked about how you used to go there, and then repeated all the same criticisms and insults. That would then be a coatrack article - it's about a school, but really most of the content is about you.


 * First article - Jimmy Jones is stupid. He can't read or write because he isn't intelligent enough, and he has really bad body odour. Jimmy should really just die.
 * Coatrack article - Jonesville High School is a high school in Jonesville. Jimmy Jones goes there. Jimmy Jones is stupid. He can't read or write because he isn't intelligent enough, and he has really bad body odour. Jimmy should really just die.


 * Does this explain things? Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 11:28, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much Forgot to put name (talk) 12:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

BLPPROD
When adding a speedy deletion tag, it's not a good idea to remove the BLPPROD tag, in case the speedy deletion is declined. That said, it's also not a good idea to add a BLPPROD tag to the biography of someone who's been dead for twenty years. Wily D 09:44, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for teaching me! Forgot to put name (talk) 09:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Dastangoi
I do not understand why you removed the article on Dastangoi from the main article space to my user space despite me tagging it for the article being under construction. I know that the article was previously deleted for a copyright violation and had wanted to make an effort to rebuild the article.

Could you please explain your rationale for this edit? Thanks Prad2609 (talk) 14:52, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Also, adding that you created a redirect and are asking for the speedy deletion on the basis of the re-direct that you created. Does not make sense. Prad2609 (talk) 15:04, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not giving a rationale for moving the article to your userspace. I forgot to give a rationale for moving the article from the mainspace to userspace. I moved the article from the main space to your user space because you tagged it that you are constructing the article. You can develop the article in the userspace without risk of deletion and when you finish constructing the article (as you have told in the article) you can move it in the main space. In progress articles are better in the user space. Thanks! Forgot to put name (talk) 15:43, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I know that it is better to make them in the userspace. However, nothing stops me from making the article in the main article space. I have raised this at the Administrator's noticeboard, now that the article has been deleted. Prad2609 (talk) 15:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Admin Noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
 * I've fixed the redirects and double-redirects created by the sloppy page moving. All fine now. GiantSnowman 16:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! Forgot to put name (talk) 16:16, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. 16:20, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nach Baliye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victory (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of The Saint of Braves Baan Gaan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Saint of Braves Baan Gaan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Saint of Braves Baan Gaan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 22:34, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Verdict
So basically in India the verdict is out, NEGATIVE, right? Because so many reviews like 15 have given it 2.5-0 stars. 0 stars like Reuters.

Should I leave the overseas verdict to "opened to negative reviews" because the two RS only showed negative reviews?

What do you think?

Ashermadan (talk) 10:59, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

AWB new version
Hey, there's a new version of AWB now available here Cheers!  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  19:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you very much! Forgot to put name 04:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)