User talk:Forhiddenfacts

It is important to show all facts. This critisism is supposed to be an eye opener for the Birlas so that they change. It is good for the country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forhiddenfacts (talk • contribs)


 * Remember that it is critical for facts to be verifiable. If you cannot back up the statement with a reliable source - especially if it relates to living people - you should not add it to Wikipedia in the first place. —C.Fred (talk) 16:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Learn to use Wikipedia
before you get start contributing here. please read the guidelines on how to use Wikipedia. You cannot make criticism here, without appropriate citations. Wikipedia is not a place for you to provide comentary. Please provide a citation from a reputed news source to back any statements in the document. Also please, do not leave Notes comentary on the main article page. Use the discussion page for this. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 16:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to NDTV has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 11:16, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Philip Trueman (talk) 11:16, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to NDTV constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Fieldday-sunday (talk) 11:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Also, in no case should a Wikipedia article carry an editor's personal opinion, as your edits to NDTV have attempted to add. —C.Fred (talk) 16:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)