User talk:Form 1040

Raymond Dean
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Raymond Dean, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bsu.edu/edpsych/profile/0,1396,1343-639-29214,00.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia. To find out how to make useful contributions, take a look at the welcome page. To stay in Wikipedia, an article has to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. Click on Notability for an explanation of what that means, and on Notability (people) for more detail. Also, it must give independently verifiable sources. Articles that don't meet these requirements are likely to be deleted. Follow the links below to learn more: JohnCD (talk) 16:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * To find out more about creating articles, read the Introduction and the guide to creating Your first article.
 * You should not write articles about yourself, your band, or your best friend - that's a conflict of interest.
 * Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Before writing about your own business, read Business' FAQ.
 * For experiments, please use the sandbox.

Speedy deletion of Raymond Dean
A tag has been placed on Raymond Dean requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kateshort forbob  15:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Please refrain from adding fraudulent edit summaries to Wikipedia as you did with Template:Neuropsychology it doesn't put your edit in a very good light! RaseaC (talk) 17:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Dean-Woodcock Neuropsychological Assessment System
Hello, Form 1040. I have read, several times, an article which you initiated, Dean-Woodcock Neuropsychological Assessment System. You may note that another editor has placed a "tag" at the top of the article, indicating multiple difficulties with it, in terms of Wikipedia's varied standards for articles. Seeing this, I thought I might try to fix some of them. Early on, though, I came to the supporting references you are using. These are the foundation of the article, but none are complete. Are these technical papers? If so, what issue(s) of what journal(s) are they from? Perhaps a book or books? If that is the case, ISBN identifiers would be useful. Also, no pagination is provided for any of them. Is it possible that these references do not provide evidence of the acceptance or notability of the assessment system, but rather may actually comprise the system? Your help on this would be greatly appreciated. Tim Ross  (talk)  21:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Raymond Dean for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raymond Dean is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Raymond Dean until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 12:06, 26 December 2013 (UTC)