User talk:Formosa's storyteller

March 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:14, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


 * ✅.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   04:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Brother Bald moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Brother Bald, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –eggofreason(talk &middot; contribs) 16:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Re:Request for joint effort for building draft:Brother_Bald
Sorry. I will not join you about building draft:Brother_Bald.--Wolfch (talk) 21:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

About the Sockpuppet
I think maybe you are a sockpuppet of it's gonna be awesome. According to the Sockpuppet investigations/It's gonna be awesome/Archive, what I think is true.

Please stop using sockpuppets because you have been blocked for such manner. Thanks --Wolfch (talk) 03:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Juat had a glance on some related rules. I believe this check didn't abide by Sock_puppetry and CheckUser. I am not blind. it's not based on technical evidence. I don't know who you're but I feel like you're somehow here to build an environment or something like that to make it look like what it seems like in your favor. Anyway, there's no rush. I will find time to read those complicated rules and prove those users are innocent. --Formosa&#39;s storyteller (talk) 14:50, 16 November 2019 (UTC)


 * If Formosa&#39;s storyteller doesn't know me, it is quite strange to invite a wikipedian like me to writing a biography of a Taiwanese in English Wikipedia. Maybe I have no idea about this person. maybe my thought is different from Formosa&#39;s storyteller's thought in that article, (Actually, our thought are different in North–South divide in Taiwan)--Wolfch (talk) 15:26, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I explained above. I didn't know User:Wolfch until he/she showed disruptive behaviors in Talk:North–South_divide_in_Taiwan. Through his/her use of English, I assumed he/she has some knowledge in Chinese; thus, I invited Wolch to collaborate in writing a biography of a Taiwanese. It's just that simple. Do you have any issue with the explanation? --Formosa&#39;s storyteller (talk) 16:00, 16 November 2019 (UTC)


 * It doesn't make sense to me. I seldom invite other unfamiliar wikipedians to collaborate just because maybe he/she has some knowledge in that field. I will ask some question which I don't know, but not to colloborate. And you said I have some "disruptive behaviors". It is why I feel strange about your behavior (invite me). --Wolfch (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I seldom invite other unfamiliar Wikipedians to collaborate... I don't agree with you. We're not here to make friends but writing encyclopediac articles. Introduction]: Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, written collaboratively by the people who use it. You showed disruptive behaviors on an article doesn't mean you're not competent at others, especially when you're just invited to contribute to a draft (See: User_talk:Wolfch). It feels like to me that you're here to monitor rather than contribution. How come?  --Formosa&#39;s storyteller (talk) 16:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, just kindly reminding your of What_Wikipedia_is_not since you tended to make Wikipedia like your own Personal essays that state your particular feelings about a topic (rather than the opinions of experts). Although Wikipedia is supposed to compile human knowledge, it is not a vehicle to make personal opinions become part of such knowledge. In the unusual situation where the opinions of an individual are important enough to discuss, it is preferable to let other people write about them. (Personal essays on Wikipedia-related topics are welcome in your user namespace or on the Meta-wiki.)--Formosa&#39;s storyteller (talk) 16:49, 16 November 2019 (UTC)