User talk:Formulax~enwiki

NOTE: I do not check this talk page regularly, so please leave a message at zh:User_talk:Formulax if you need to contact me.

old talk
Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Help or drop me a line. Cheers! --maveric149

Hi! Since you're from mainland China, can you comment on Talk:Father of the Nation on whether Sun Zhongshan is referred to as Guofu? --Jiang 22:28, 4 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Regarding Algebra I, shouldn't topics like factorization go into Algebra II? Algebra I is introduction to higher maths, and is only a one-year course. Not much can be covered in that year. --Geoffrey 02:55, 21 Sep 2003 (UTC)

'Wiki' in Chinese
How do you refer to Wikipedia in Chinese now? What is wiki in Chinese? Can you splice that onto 全书? Fuzheado 07:33, 26 Sep 2003 (UTC)


 * What do you mean 'no Chinese text for "Wikipedia"? -- Perhaps the reason for the hesitation is that using hanzi for phonetic substitution is a misuse of it? Why not use ideographic forms instead of trying to make something phonetic out of non-related hanzi? Even zhuyin and pinyin would be preferable to that, dont you think? So something distinct like 速全周宙書? -戴眩sv 09:04, 26 Sep 2003 (UTC)


 * It's currently under discussion at zh:Wikipedia:Wikipedia的中文名. The current consensus is 维基 (Wéijī), one of the closest transcriptions to Wiki that literally means "Maintaining the Foundation".
 * For the "Encyclopedia" part, most support 全书 (quanshu). Some, on the other hand, support the extra-full 大百科全书 (Dà Baikequanshu, "Grand Encyclopedia").
 * --Menchi 04:08, 27 Sep 2003 (UTC)


 * Pinyin is not preferrable, because it is not common to use latin letters to name something in Chinese. They only help people to pronounce a character, and are not part of the standard Chinese language.
 * We acutally came out with this name first, and then check the dictionary to see if it is appropriate. 维基 literally means "Maintaining the Foundation", but 维 can be explained as both "web"(as a noun) or "to link something". And 基 can be explained as "foundation stone"(基石). So basically the name means "to link the foundation stones(of knowledge)" or "a web of knowledge(foundation stones). The beauty(or cumbersome?) of Chinese is that there are so many different meanings for one character! --Formulax 08:52, 30 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Hi, Formulax. I would appreciate your opinion on the current Talk:Zhou Dynasty (1122 BC - 256 BC). Cheers, kt2 00:33, 27 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Picture dispute
There's a bit of dispute over the September 11 pic (WTC1.JPG) that you uploaded at the Chinese Wikipedia. I put the Chinese pic onto the English version (renamed to 2wtccrash.jpg on EN) earlier in Dec. 2003. Mav suspected that it was a violation of copyright policy, delinked it, and asked me where I got it from. I told him on the talk page that it was from the Chinese Wikipedia. Anthere asked me what the desc. means on the Chinese page. I've decided to ask you what it meant since you uploaded the pic to the ZH server.

See: User_talk:Maveric149 for more details WhisperToMe 03:36, 16 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Hey, are you home (presumably Shanghai) for spring festival? If so, I'm having a party this Saturday the 24th, you can email me webmaster@pratyeka.org if you want to come, as the sole other Shanghai wikipedian ... there'll be a few Chinese native speakers, a bunch of internet randoms and some waiguoren. Zhongshan gongyuan. Maybe see you then ... prat 05:15, 2004 Jan 22 (UTC)

Hi, looking at the history of the Wikimedia server page on zh: it looks like I messed it up; sorry about that. I see you left a message for me but unfortunately I don't speak Chinese. I just wanted to update the page to point to the new location of the stats, as I won't be hosting the page at the old location indefinitely. Jeronim 11:33, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)


 * That's ok, I've updated the link.--Formulax 09:59, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)

New mailing list for the chinese Wikipedia
Hello. We have just added a new mailing list for the chinese Wikipedia. You can find it here: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikizh-l Please advertise this list on the chinese Wikipedia to let people know about the list. If there will be a problem with the character encoding, or when you have a question, please contact Fire or Brion. Fire 05:36, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)


 * I have copied the message to the Chinese Village Pump. You could post there as well (in English is perfectly fine) -- directly, bypassing a messenger. Thank you for making this. We'll give it a try and tell you what happens. --Menchi 05:51, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

new translations
Hello, Formulax.

There are two new translation efforts this week: a wikimedia newsletter, and a global press release. We very much need someone to handle Chinese translation, and provide feedback on wikiprojects on zh:. See Translation requests for details. +sj + 20:54, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Singapore
Formulax:

There's a situation down at Singapore: a number of anon users are repeatedly editing the page, putting in negative comments about Singapore. I've tried discussing on talk, but they have NOT responded, instead they simply reverted everything again and again. I've asked for help on WP:VIP. Can you come over and take a look? -- ran [[User talk:Ran|(talk)]] 20:37, Sep 13, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Copyright in China
You said:
 * I notice that the current English Wikipedia notice about copyright of China is not accurate. Not all copyright expires after 50 years. If you read carefully the original legal verse says those materials whose copyright belong to an organization(eg government, news agency, etc) will have their copyrights expired on Dec 31 of the 50th year of publication; however if the copyright belongs to an individual, it expires 50 years after the death of the copyright holder; if the copyright belongs to a group of individuals, it expires 50 years after the death of the last copyright holder. And for those works that is not published within 50 years of creation, it will not copyrighted.--Formulax 08:40, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

That's true for non-photographs. But for photographs, the term is different. I quote from :


 * III. Term of Protection


 * There is no time limitation on moral rights protection. Generally, the term of protection of publication rights and other copyrights is the life of the author plus fifty years. In the following instances, the term of copyright is fifty years:


 * When the author of the work is a corporation or other entity;
 * When the work is a photographic work, cinematographic, television and audio-visual work;
 * When the radio or television program was broadcasted.

End quote.

I believe that this is also stated in, but I don't read Chinese. – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 18:26, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Mao.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mao.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 18:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC) Thuresson 21:41, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

East Turkistan Islamic Movement and Al Qaeda
You asserted that several ETIM members acknowledged being trained by Al Qaeda. I asked about that, because I have read the transcripts of the Uighurs in Guantanamo. They all denied any ties ot Al Qaeda or the Taliban. Perhaps you were referring to other Uighurs? Can you supply a source? -- Geo Swan 15:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Hu4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hu4.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Singapore parliament 01.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Singapore parliament 01.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:27, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Formulax. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Formulax~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 12:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Chinese writers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Chinese writers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Chinese writers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mucube (talk • contribs) 02:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)