User talk:Forsariously

RealTouch
Please note that the page for RealTouch has been redirected to AEBN - a change I agree with. As a tentative product that hasn't been released yet, I think it's a bit early to write a whole page on it and add it throughout wikipedia. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 17:23, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Is this the only objection to RealTouch having its own page, that it is classified as a 'tentative product'? Because it has actually been available for purchase since November 2009, which was mentioned and cited in the information on the RealTouch standalone page. Forsariously (talk) 21:03, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Not really - it's sort-of recentism. Just because there's news stories doesn't mean it's worth talking about.  There have been thousands of products released to great fanfare that ended up dying.  While some are worth talking about (i.e. the DeLorean) others aren't.  You can't tell until after the fact.  Right now this is a miscelaneous sex widget and there's no evidence it has revolutionized anything.  Would you have a wiki page for every single type of dildo produced by a company?  Not unless it were somehow noteworthy (i.e. the Rabbit vibrator was a plot point in a major television series).  If it becomes an internet sensation then great but until then it's pretty minor.  The write-ups also read like marketing material rather than a neutral description.  WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 21:16, 2 February 2010 (UTC)