User talk:Forsts23

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Forsts23! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! User:Marek69. 18:36, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Nairi
Hey there! Aregakn (talk) 13:50, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Aregakn (talk) 13:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Sanction warning
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. Stifle (talk) 10:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Urartu. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 22:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

I assume you are a sock of a banned user. If you are not, pray think twice about joining the Armenian troll cloud in their disruption. --dab (𒁳) 11:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Mitanni
You're hardly one to talk about discussion, given you haven't used the talk page in weeks and haven't addressed the clear and compelling reasons why that material violates explicit Wikipedia policies, which I laid out with plenty of advance warning on said talk page. Thanatosimii (talk) 00:07, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Consistently restoring your preferred version of an article while the consensus of just about everyone else is that it's in violation of Wikipedia policies still constitutes an edit war, even if you use the talk page to tell us why you think we're wrong. If you don't actually build consensus for your version, you can't keep reverting to it. Thanatosimii (talk) 21:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Mitanni. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. you are actually at 4RR Dougweller (talk) 04:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

3RR
Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 05:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 48 hours, for violation of the three revert rule at Mitanni. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 11:46, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement request
As I understand it, your edit-warring at Mitanni and Urartu are in breach of the sanctions you were warned about last month, and I have raised an enforcement request at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. I or someone else will relay any comments you make here to that page. Dougweller (talk) 15:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Topic ban
As per the enforcement request at WP:AE, you are now topic-banned from all edits relating to the topics of Urartu, Mitanni and related aspects of early Armenian history, for a period of four months, under the rules of Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. If you edit in contravention of this ban, you will be blocked. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:52, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * After receiving this notice of a ban duly given under arbitration, you made this edit that's clearly related to Mitanni, and therefore you've been blocked for 24 hours. Do not continue to edit anything under your above-mentioned topic ban or you will continue to be blocked. If you wish to make such edits, you must successfully appeal the ban (see requests for amendment. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)