User talk:Fortrade59

November 2014
Hello, I'm Winner 42. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Monte Boulanger— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me!  19:17, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Boulanger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alex Boulanger was changed by Fortrade59 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852692 on 2014-11-16T19:17:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:18, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Alex Boulanger with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Avono (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Boulanger with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Avono (talk) 19:27, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Monte Boulanger shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrBill3 (talk) 19:32, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. MrBill3 (talk) 19:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

To propose deletion of an article
To propose deletion of an article (that would be non controversial) see WP:PROD or possibly WP:SPEEDY, for deletions that may be controversial see WP:AfD. Please note once content is on WP the processes should be followed. Sorry if you have had some difficulty with getting this done. - - MrBill3 (talk) 19:42, 16 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I have withdrawn the Edit Warring report. I have removed most of the content of both articles (with an edit summary). I have tagged both of them for speedy deletion. I mean no offense but both articles can probably be speedily deleted on the basis that the subjects do not meet the criteria of notability for inclusion on Wikipedia. I personally think the articles did not have the kind of information you are concerned about, but I'm happy to do what I can to help. Privacy is an important concern at WP. I certainly hope you consider continuing to edit here at WP, good writers with varied perspectives contribute valuable content. - - MrBill3 (talk) 20:04, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
- - MrBill3 (talk) 22:40, 16 November 2014 (UTC)