User talk:Forza bruta

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The garmine was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Forza bruta/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The garmine  (talk)  13:23, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Forza bruta/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Forza bruta/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a draft which has not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JustaZBguy (talk) 19:59, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Tito
They keep deleting my edits on Tito. Here is my latest letter I wrote after edition (not yet deleted):

I have added info on Tito's victims from an academic article, and there are many. Why do you keep deleting this? Wikipedia should provide info based on scholarly research, whereas this Tito's article is heavily biased. In addition, why have you changed back to a language that is non-existent?

What is going on? Tito's page looks as if Tito wrote it! In addition, they use Serbo-Croatian, a language noone uses, noone accepts as even existing, and which does not exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arslan Arie (talk • contribs) 13:16, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Disputa
Una disputa, secondo le regole di questo progetto, serve per risolvere un problema di conflitto ossia scontro dei punti di vista quindi se tu non la vuoi avviare, lo farò io perchè mi sono stufato di vedere la propaganda nell'articolo di quello squallido tiranno. Inoltre in tutti gli articoli sulla Iugoslavia ho trovato e trovo fonti totalmente false o massicciamente manipolate e gli amministratori non se ne accorgono perchè neanche conoscono il contenuto dei vari libri.--Teo Pitta (talk) 14:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Tito edits
You can't put stuff in the article that isn't in the source. The linked source says nothing about a planned economy like the USSR, it just says a planned economy. Just stick to what the source says, in your own words. This stuff isn't that hard, and competency is required to edit WP. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ivan Pauletta for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivan Pauletta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ivan Pauletta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Gabriel  (talk to me )  19:38, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Please note that I am not interested in discussing Wikipedia matters with you by e-mail. I very frequently delete emails via Wikipedia as soon as I read them, having found that they rarely contain anything that either wouldn't be more appropriately discussed on relevant Wikipedia talk pages, or doesn't merit discussion at all. Since I seem to have deleted your September email, evidently the same applied there. And frankly, without an apology from you for your last post on my talk page, I see no reason to engage in discussion with you at all. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:40, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Talk pages and harassment
When an editor asks you not to post on their talk page aside from required notifications, the expectation is that you honour their request. I have to say, it seems counterintuitive to bring up the thread at ANI that was shut down as baseless and which nearly resulted in the person who started the thread being sanctioned, it only serves to weaken your position.--  Ponyo bons mots 21:27, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cullen328 (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

This project is founded on collaboration: I used talk page of other account for improving of articles by friendly discussion with user AndytheGrump but he put answer in this my talk using hostile and provoking language that you can read. Yesterday I made first action of guideline for dispute resolution: I just contacted him on his talk page with friendly language for a gentlmen agreement but his reaction was disruptive and provoking versus me. Furthermore I was blocked without a warning and I ask unblock regarding this bizarre situation because I would like only collaboration togheter with user AndytheGrump. Forza bruta (talk) 21:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Forza bruta!


Happy New Year! Forza bruta, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Abishe (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

POV pushing
A reminder that POV pushing is "the aggressive presentation of a particular point of view in an article, particularly when used to denote the undue presentation of minor or fringe ideas." Adding "after crimes made by communist totalitarianism" to the lead of communism-related articles regardless of the context is indeed POV pushing, as you are arbitrarily adding a sentence denouncing communism, contrary to WP:NPOV.

You have already been warned in the past about civility, edit warring, and generally ignoring rules highlighted for you by other editors. You have also been blocked for personal attacks against other editors. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's rulesets, you will be permanently blocked as you are clearly not here to build an encyclopedia, despite your claims of good faith. Yue 🌙 01:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)