User talk:Foucauld1

Welcome!

 * }

Your edits
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. 99.149.85.114 (talk) 18:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Your sole purpose for editing on Wikipedia appears to be to expunge sourced content that reflects negatively on the subject, with no explanation. If that continues I'll seek remedy through an administrative noticeboard. Thanks, 99.149.85.114 (talk) 18:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I've responded to your note at my talk page. I think raising your concerns at the article talk page, or at the BLP noticeboard are the way to go here. Extensive editing of one's own biography is problematic. If the article contains obvious falsehoods they will be removed, but it requires more than you saying that they're false.... 99.149.85.114 (talk) 20:04, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You've removed all sources again. Again, I'd strongly recommend discussion at the relevant pages. 99.149.85.114 (talk) 20:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Your recent editing history at Virgil Miller Newton shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:39, 27 January 2012 (UTC)