User talk:Fourlaxers

May 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Digimon Adventure 02. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * To clarify, as was explained in the discussion that you started at Talk:List of Jessie episodes, "kids" is not an appropriate word to use in an encyclopaedia, which uses a formal tone, per WP:TONE. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 21:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tai Kamiya, you may be blocked from editing.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 00:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Thomas & Friends (series 1), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Please see WP:KIDSTVDATES. '' Sum mer PhD v2.0 17:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Possessives
Hi; I just reverted your edit on the Severus Snape page. As per, for example, the Chicago Manual of Style, possessives for names that end in "s" are given by "'s", and not just the apostrophe (which is how possessive for plural nouns is given). The only exceptions to this rule are names that end in an eeze sound (such as "Xerxes"), and for historical reasons, "Jesus" when referring to the figure from Christianity. So "Sirius", "Severus", "Greenglass", all take possessives as "'s". Magidin (talk) 18:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Nocturnal Animals. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have received prior warnings about edit warring and disruptive editing. Please familiarize yourself with the Manual of Style, which clearly states that we do "not make analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about information found in a primary source". Continued reversions to maintain unencyclopedic edits will result in your being blocked. Grandpallama (talk) 18:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Grown Ups 2. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''Please don't add your own personal interpretation of a film's reception. This is original research and is forbidden by Wikipedia policy.'' NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Grown Ups 2, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You need to stop adding your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. This includes adding your own personal interpretation of a film's reception.  We use reliable sources for this, such as Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic.  These review aggregators tell us what percentage of surveyed critics liked it.  To extrapolate from these review aggregators – for example, to say that a film was "universally panned" – is original research.  We can't know whether every single critic in the world gave a film a negative review.  If you continue edit warring to add your original research, I will bring this to WP:ANI and ask to have you blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Fourlaxers. Thank you. Grandpallama (talk) 10:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
Last August I put in "Noticed Errors" on the talk page of Gosei Sentai Dairanger. Someone removed it in April. I'm glad that they did because Someone else fixed the said errors. I'm If anyone deletes "Noticed Errors" that's a good thing because the Errors were fixed.