User talk:FourtySix&Two

Auslogics Disk Defrag
If you really want to spend your time re-creating a page about this software, I'd recommend first creating it in a subpage of your user page, such as ---

User:FourtySix&Two/Auslogics Disk Defrag

and then having some other admin take a look at it to determine whether it is worthy of moving into article space at that time. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 21:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * That is certainly doable, and is a very nice piece of information (and thanks for the link as I would not have figured that one out). Only problem is, I don't know a lot about the software, I am a software engineer myself and understand a lot about the underlying API's, I was going to create more of a stub - the software is huge and i figured the page would grow if someone would get it recreated. Can stubs be moved into "article space"?FourtySix&amp;Two (talk)


 * There are plenty of stubs in article space: so long as they're referenced, and about genuinely notable subjects, with independent references, the fact that they're short is not a problem. You may wish to review the notability guideline for products before deciding whether to undertake this creation. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 22:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rebecca Black, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Novice7 (talk) 17:38, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Bongwarrior, you are the blocking admin. I already believed this user was a strong candidate for unblocking, given the time that had passed and the rejection of the earlier vandalism. The follow-up to my question has fully satisfied me. The earlier inappropriate edits look to be typical silliness and nothing more. I therefore believe it would be appropriate to lift the block here. As the blocking administrator, do you have any objections? --Yamla (talk) 16:49, 29 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Nope, no objections. Eight years is a long time. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:30, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks!

Proposed deletion of TightWiki


The article TightWiki has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I can't find any secondary coverage of this online, and there's no indication of how it meets WP:PRODUCT or WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uncle Spock (talk) 04:40, 29 April 2023 (UTC)