User talk:Foxtrot19

Speedy deletion of Ryan William Cook
A tag has been placed on Ryan William Cook, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Beach drifter (talk) 22:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

The article Ryan William Cook has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dloh cierekim'''  22:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Ryan William Cook revisited
Thanks for your note. Unfortunately you will need verifiable sources that show notability. On reviewing the article, I see neither.

Notability needs to be more than "local". Also, the article was rife nonsense like "showered with worldly goods" and "when the command wolf was caught having a three way affair . . . ." It goes on to describe other unsavory activities. At no point does it assert notability. From what I can see, you'd be as well of starting from scratch! I am unable to find any Google hits that would assert notability or verify any of the content in the deleted article.

Please read the manual of style to see how to better write articles. Another problem is the lack of verifiable sources. Defamatory information is unacceptable. Please see WP:BLP. Any negative material must be sourced from reliable sources-- Please see WP:RS. Please do not attempt to recreate this article without a thorough understanding of notability and verifiability. Unsourced material that violates WP:BLP will be removed as soon as it is seen.

I see you already got a welcome. It has links to our policies and guidelines to help you edit constructively. Please feel free to resubmit the article if you can show verifiable sources and that the article meets notability. Cheers, Dloh  cierekim'''  01:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

text from deleted article
here you are

Sorry you feel this is a matter of my opinion. It is a matter of building an encyclopedia. You might want to try a personal webhost, like Facebook. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim'''  01:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)