User talk:Fpi007

 Hello Fpi007, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.


 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

 Good luck, and have fun.

Speedy deletion nomination of Ariel Investigations, Inc.
A tag has been placed on Ariel Investigations, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. CardinalDan (talk) 20:52, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Peter F. Paul
The Peter F. Paul page is scrupulously researched and footnoted. Your replacing it with a page that omits or minimizes his various criminal convictions, while removing all footnotes, is of no help. We welcome constructive edits, but please stop repeatedly pasting this hagiography over the text of the article. Uucp (talk) 19:56, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Your addition to Peter F. Paul has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:12, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content, as you did at Peter F. Paul‎. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:46, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * You also seemed to have changed your story between requests. Are you Mr. Paul himself or a private investigator hired by him from prison? Not sure it really matters at this point but if you are gong to lie remember to be consistent. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm also somewhat concerned/confused by this. I've blocked the other account until all this is sorted out. -- Kinu  t/c 01:30, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The article has 63 references attached which verify the basic facts of Mr. Paul's various criminal convictions, including verification that he is a federal prisoner . You repeatedly replaced it with a massive copyright violation, and now you are coming dangerously close to making a legal threat. You are moving farther from being unblocked with each successive request, you might want to review the guide to appealing blocks if you want to be allowed to continue appealing in this manner, or your talk page may be revoked. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:30, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Accounts cannot be deleted for technical (no means in MediaWiki) and legal (licensing requirements) reasons. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 21:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Becky Altringer


The article Becky Altringer has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Blocked User:Fpi007 requests (on their talk page) to delete, and claims to be the author _ probably true.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Ron h jones (Talk) 20:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Becky Altringer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Becky Altringer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Becky Altringer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:11, 2 September 2011 (UTC)