User talk:FrB.TG/Archive 9

Request for comment
here.--MaranoFan (talk) 15:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Eega
You are leaving, but i do have a reason to smile. Eega is now a FA! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Another barnstar for you
Thank you,. I've just decided not to create content for an indefinite period. I never had the joy of having an FA on first attempt, something I achieved with Taylor Swift's article, a stress-free nomination - I'm glad. – FrB.TG (talk) 17:25, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

TFA
I have Peter Reulein below it, DYK, - excited to premiere his oratorio today (in one of the five choirs) at the Limburg Cathedral! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

FLC request
Hi. Hope you are doing well. This probably is not your area of interest and looks like you are also not active on Wiki much, just like me, but if you get some time, could you please take a look at the FLC nomination for Jnanpith Award. Feel free to refuse. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 05:45, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Taylor Swift discography
I'm not sure why you considered the Roughstock website unreliable, but it is a website that has been going on for a long time, and giving reliable sales information on Country albums for many years. Hzh (talk) 19:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Well, I'll try this again, you are required to give a reasonable explanation when you keep reverting other people's edits. The worldwide figure is 5 years old, so of course it is lower.  Hzh (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Help
Hello, old familiar friend. Do you have a moment? There's a screwed-up parameter here that I can't pinpoint the solution to. An IP added it (and it was a missing video too), but it just wasn't inputted correctly.  danny music editor  Speak up! 18:16, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Oh my gosh lol. I gave you the wrong link. I'm sorry.  danny music editor  Speak up! 00:06, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Rajinikanth filmography/archive2
Hello there, Frank. How are things with you? I've graduated from University BTW. Requesting your input here. Warmest regards. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 08:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, he seems to have retired . Kailash29792 (talk) 08:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Not really/permanently. I saw his contribution page and he is checking in from time to time. —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 08:49, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

TFAR
Today's featured article/requests/Bradley Cooper --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Well then I better hurry making his filmography an FL and him a featured topic before his birthday, doesn't seem quite possible though. – FrB.TG (talk) 18:15, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Please don't feel rushed, - if it's too soon, he will have a birthday a year later also. - I opened a FAC today, hoping for 2 February, and a year would miss a point ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:20, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I wasn't quite planning for this year (TBH I didn't have a plan for a TFA) but now that it's open, I think it can run if things go well at the TFAR. – FrB.TG (talk) 18:38, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jennifer Lawrence
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jennifer Lawrence you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jennifer Lawrence
The article Jennifer Lawrence you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jennifer Lawrence for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 19:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jennifer Lawrence
The article Jennifer Lawrence you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jennifer Lawrence for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Good to have another one accomplished! I've taken it to DYK, and let's get a good PR afterwards before anything else. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The FAC is coming along better than I thought it would. Her article might not have passed yet (still waiting for HJ Mitchell to say if he has any additional comments), but I definitely look forward to getting another FA! Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Margaret (singer)
Hi, I've recently been working on this article and just wanted to get in touch with few native speakers who would review it for me, so that everything is grammatically correct and flows nicely. I would really appreciate your help. ArturSik (talk) 18:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Hey, thanks a lot for your edits. There's one more thing, don't know if you've noticed anything weird about it, but one of the other users that I got in touch with has said that the name of the award category 'Best Artist in Web' doesn't make sense and he doesn't know what it means, I've found another translation - 'Best Artist Network' if that helps but I personally think that 'Best Artist in Web' is pretty clear. basically what it is awarded for are the YT views, social media, followers etc, their online image. actually, there's something else. someone also suggested that the information '... with a degree in fashion design' from the lead should be removed as she's not known as a fashion designer and doesn't do anything in fashion as a designer, and I agree with that, what do you think? ArturSik (talk) 19:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * What can you do if the title of the category does not make sense? A title is a title you can't change it. I agree with the fashion designing bit to not be present in the lead. - FrB.TG (talk) 19:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Well it does make sense in Polish and I'm trying to find the best possible translation so that English-speaking people can understand what it means. I didn't know that 'Best Artist in Web' means absolutely nothing. Don't know what to do about it. ArturSik (talk) 13:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * How about 'Best Network Artist'? ArturSik (talk) 14:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)


 * thanks for the input, and no I didn't tbh, cause you - English speakers - wouldn't understand it anyway, that's why I wanted to find the best translation for it, but as it turns out you don't understand that one either. I think it's the use of words that makes it so hard to translate, cause in English you wouldn't name it that way. God why did they make it so difficult? ArturSik (talk) 18:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I am not a native speaker of English. Perhaps you could write it as "Best Artist on the Internet"? - FrB.TG (talk) 18:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * if that makes sense then definitely cause that is more less what it is in Polish, tbh didn't think of it in first place. thanks. ArturSik (talk) 19:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * sorry, but could you have a quick look at it again, I've just added few things to it that I'm not 100% of. ArturSik (talk) 01:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ok, so I've moved the information from the personal life section to 'early life'. Also added few things there, so if you could have a look. Now I'm about to add sources to the music videos section ps. Thanks, I hope it will do well, but you and another user helped a lot so again thank you. ArturSik (talk) 09:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)


 * hey, I've made few changes and added few things since your last edit. if you could have a look that would be brilliant. I hope no more changes for now, but I'm sure you know what it is like, when you always want to make it better, and it doesn't stop. ArturSik (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Lady Gaga
You removed this bit here about the record for The Monster Ball Tour, with the edit summary as asking what The Fame Ball Tour was. Well the record specified by Billboard is for a "debut headlining artist". Gaga did not headline always with the Fame Ball since she was the opening act in many areas. With Monster Ball she was the headlining act always. I suggest you restore this bit. I did not want to revert you thinking to cause bad faith. — I B  [ Poke  ] 12:53, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Hrithik Roshan page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=756950780 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F756950780%7CHrithik Roshan%5D%5D Ask for help])

Peer review/Keechaka Vadham/archive1
Hello, Frank, and Happy New Year to you. I plan to take this to FA. Do let me know if you wish to leave comments at the PR page by pinging me. Thanks. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup
Hi! Am not sure if you have notice it or not, but the annual editing competition WikiCup has started and the signup is open till 5 February 2017. The cup encourages content improvement and tries to make editing on Wikipedia more fun; and it did that for me last year. I have hence decided to drop this friendly note hoping that you would take part. Although the signup ends on 5th Feb, the earlier you sign in the earlier you start scoring. Happy New Year and Happy Editing! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Jennifer Lawrence
 Schwede 66  00:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hrithik Roshan
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hrithik Roshan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 18:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Peer review/Veerapandiya Kattabomman (film)/archive1
Hello, Frank. I plan to take this to FA. Do let me know if you wish to leave comments at the PR page by pinging me. Thanks. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:28, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Thala
I, Kailash29792 and Vensatry have nominated Ajith Kumar filmography for FLC, Frank. Do let either of us know if you wish to leave comments at the page here. Thanks. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Just a gentle reminder. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:12, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Indian Premier League seasons and results/archive1
Not expecting a qpq; just a quick dekko if you have time. Thanks. Lourdes

Your GA nomination of Hrithik Roshan
The article Hrithik Roshan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hrithik Roshan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 15:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hey Frankie, I know that you are not as active as you used to be here, but, I was wondering that if you find some spare time would you mind taking a look at this? Numerounovedant  Talk  16:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks
I know, right? I did act like one back in October or so, but was recently in the mood for content creation. – FrB.TG (talk) 15:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * And you are still going... Are you preparing it for FA?  Bollyjeff  &#124;  talk  15:02, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Yup, it's time we write some FAs on actors too, no? — FrB.TG (talk) 15:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Hrithik Roshan
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Hrithk Roshan has been completed.

If you have the time and the inclination, you might want to visit the Wayback Machine site and archive the article's citations. I did one, #3, to demonstrate the syntax. Unfortunately lots of sites do not allow their pages to be archived.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:12, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
My FLN passed. Your contribution is much appreciated by me. Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Cheers. Lourdes 15:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Incorrect correction
You are possibly already aware of this error. You incorrectly "corrected" my correction of incorrect "whom" to correct "who" in the article "Bradley Cooper." The sentence in question was, "He cites actor Daniel Day-Lewis as an influence, whom he thinks is "the World's Greatest Actor." The dependant clause is "who is the world's greatest actor," with "who" as the subject. The "he thinks" is merely a parenthetical phrase and has no influence on the who/whom question. MrSlade (talk) 17:53, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Top-10 lists
I've begun a dialog at Talk:List of accolades received by Inside Out (2015 film). WP:FILMMOS states explicitly that except for the AFI list, we do not include top-10 lists. Per WP:BRD, after being reverted you do not edit-war but rather discuss the issue on the talk page.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:58, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Margaret (singer) new
Hi, I've tweaked the lead a little. Could you have a look ? ArturSik (talk) 13:31, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks good. – FrB.TG (talk) 14:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Hey. The article was recently promoted to GA however since then I've changed quite a lot and added new information, so the whole article evolved and I was thinking if you could have a read through to check if everything is okay, cause I think it turned into a bit of a mess in the process. ArturSik (talk) 14:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Hrithik Roshan
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thank you, Doc. How have you been? – FrB.TG (talk) 18:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Sharon Stone - featured list candidate
I've nominated the article about the episode List of awards and nominations received by Sharon Stone for Featured List consideration. I would really appreciate any comments or feedback on this nomination. I understand that you are busy so it is completely okay if you are unable to do this. I apologize for any inconvenience.

The link is here if you are interested: Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Sharon Stone/archive1. Thank you for your time. Aoba47 (talk) 21:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure, later tomorrow if not today. – FrB.TG (talk) 09:56, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 18:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

My current FAC
I earlier told you I would make comments at Roshan's FAC, provided you do the same at Andha Naal (my current FAC). Now that I support Roshan's FAC, can you please return the favour? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Vijay and Suriya filmographies
My two FLC's, here and here. Please do have a look at them. I'll look at Hrithik's FAC in return. Thanks. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look at FLC and 's FAC soon, although the latter's nom does not look like needing prose review. – FrB.TG (talk) 20:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Hrithik Roshan
Hey, I just noticed that you reverted my edits on Hrithik Roshan's article. I haven't copied it from other's article. And I think that my changes were more efficient and appropriate. Waiting for your reply. Reply me on my talk page. Thank you!! Tharki Saala (talk) 17:12, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note I've blocked this account as confirmed sock of .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

What's Your Raashee?
Would you like to review What's Your Raashee? for GA? I would appreciate your gesture. Krish |  Talk  15:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry,, but I don't think that I have much time here, although I can review an FLC of yours if you have an ongoing one. – FrB.TG (talk) 07:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It's okay and yes, I have an ongoing FLC. Krish |  Talk  11:45, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
OMG you're back! So happy to see you here. :) – FrB.TG (talk) 15:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Please make a visit to my talk page tou really understand the situation. :) Pavanjandhyala  16:14, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I know that you're back temporarily, but still.. – FrB.TG (talk) 16:17, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Words IMHO are inexplicably marvelous agents of letting things work, especially when one has made proper choices at the proper place within the proper time. So, despite being unable to be poetic enough, i often marvel at my ability to twist words to let them sound good at least. So... Another one! Thank you friend. Also, I love your words above the barnstar. – FrB.TG (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Shruti Haasan filmography
I hate to be too formal these days, so i'll keep it straight. Hope you would throw some comments here. Pavanjandhyala 10:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

What next?
Aishwarya Rai, Aamir Khan (not without a collaborator), Ryan Reynolds or Hugh Jackman? – FrB.TG (talk)
 * I think you can work on Rai's article with Krimuk, since he has been its major contributor. I'm also a fan of rest of them, so its your call. But Bollywood actor's have far less FA's and GA's than Hollywood. Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that is what I would like, too, but Rai's page looks too controversial so I will stay away from it (at least for now) and I don't want to interfere in Krimuk's every work. So now I have to choose between Reynolds and Jackman. – FrB.TG (talk) 12:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Jackman sounds like a good choice! Numerounovedant   Talk  15:26, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

GAR
Would you by any chance have time for reviewing this? It's a relatively short article, thanks. Numerounovedant  Talk  20:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * , sorry I don't have any experience in television whatsoever. You could perhaps ask the previous reviewer. Thanks for the barnstar btw. – FrB.TG (talk) 19:13, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries. Numerounovedant   Talk  18:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Bradley Cooper
Hi. First of all, sorry for reverting your edit. That was just an accident as I intended to talk to you first. You said that I should add the information about the child when he/she is born, but why? For example, there's already mentioned on Beyoncé's article that she's expecting twins. Another example would be George Clooney. So may I ask why you think we shouldn't include details about Cooper's unborn child on his article? Keivan.f Talk 11:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for being considerate enough to discuss first. It is just in my opinion that it is more notable when the child is born, but I don't feel strongly about it, so feel free to revert to your edit. – FrB.TG (talk) 06:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Evita (1996 film)/archive1
FrB.TG I know that you are kinda semi-retired now, but if you get any chance, can you take a look at the above article? A cursory glance maybe? You are more than welcome to review it though if you want to. Thanks in advance and I hope you are back in full capacity soon. — I B  [ Poke  ] 05:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, . Sorry for the late reply. I have conducted a source review there; not really up to doing a prose review right now. Hope I helped. – FrB.TG (talk) 19:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi I'm sorry to see that you are semi-retired. If you are online would you please just see the source reviews that the user has addressed in the article? That way we can close this. (Wish you are back full-form). — I B  [ Poke  ] 05:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Peter Dinklage
Hi. I have been looking at the amazing work you have done on the Emma Stone articles. I myself have been working on Peter Dinklage articles:


 * Peter Dinklage is a Good Aricle now, working on FA
 * Peter Dinklage on screen and stage has been brought up to FL
 * List of awards and nominations received by Peter Dinklage has been nominated for a FL

I can see that you are semi-retired now, but i'm wondering if you have time, could you look at Peer review/Peter Dinklage/archive1 and give some feedback to what I need to improve, for me to nominate it for FA. - AffeL (talk) 12:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the kind words, . Do you mind if I perform some tweaks myself instead of suggesting them at the PR? – FrB.TG (talk) 19:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes.. go ahead. That's more than enough. - AffeL (talk) 19:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Hey!
An user has demanded a close look at the article. Since you are quite good with correcting mistakes, would you take a loo at Mary Kom (film), not the FAC but the article to see if there are silly mistakes like commas or grammar? I would appreciate it. Krish |  Talk  13:27, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not an excellent copy-editor, but I will go through your article tomorrow and see of how much help I will be to you. – FrB.TG (talk) 19:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * A gentle reminder. Krish |  Talk  05:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Are you done with the article? I asked you to look out for the imptoper use of commas and stuff but you started copy editing.....its good but you haven't even completed. Are you very busy or what? This is the one favour I asked you and I appreciate what you have done till now. Krish |  Talk  15:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am busy in real life. If you are done with your kinda-sarcastic comment, I should tell you that I will finish it tomorrow. – FrB.TG (talk) 21:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Dinklage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dwarf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Copy-edit
Hey Frankie, I hope that you're doing well. If you find some spare time, can you help me with a quick copy-edit to Nil Battey Sannata? It's a relatively short article, and though I feel that the prose is lacking in parts, I promise it won't be too much work. Thanks either way. Numerounovedant  Talk  19:19, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Kalidas (film)
The article is undergoing a FAR here. Please provide comments before it is closed. Thank you. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:01, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Lady Gaga
I'm afraid although I agree with the whole cleanup going on, the prose is severely affected now with proseline. Let me know once you are done with this as it would require a good copy edit. — I B  [ Poke  ] 10:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * rest of the sections are fine. The 2015 one is however a little bit tricky because of the different types of work she has since done. Honestly I don't think there is so much we can do about it, as it is quite difficult to connect them with each other. – FrB.TG (talk) 13:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * No I do not think the rest of the sections are also totally fine. And I'm sure a prose refresh and copy edit would be needed. Connection can me made using bit of direct quotes and maybe we can prune some stuff actually altogether. Like commercials and live performances unless its an impactful one. — I B  [ Poke  ] 06:24, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * , I agree. Not all performances and commercials need to be included, as it has unnecessarily increased the size of the article, which is quite large for a young woman like Gaga. We can look upon Taylor Swift and Katy Perry as models for Gaga's article. – FrB.TG (talk) 12:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Madras (film)
Hello Frank, how's everything with you? My fourth attempt at a film accolades list for FLC. I have nominated the list here. Feel free to leave comments. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 09:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey, . Everything's fine, hope everything's fine with you. I will take a look at your FLC soon, and I have also nominated La La Land's accolades for FL. If you have the time and inclination, please take a look. – FrB.TG (talk) 12:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok. I will do so tomorrow. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 14:50, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Could you also have a look at my other FLC? Thanks. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! :) – FrB.TG (talk) 19:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for Jennifer Lawrence who "set a few records at the Oscars"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. – FrB.TG (talk) 07:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Peer review/M. G. Ramachandran filmography/archive1
I have opened up a PR for my next future attempt at FLC. Please feel free to leave comments there. Thanks. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:45, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Good . It looks well written. – FrB.TG (talk) 17:13, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Lady Gaga
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Lady Gaga has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * much for the ce, much appreciated. – FrB.TG (talk) 17:13, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

FAC
Hey FrB.TG, hope you're doing good, if you find some time, would you mind taking a look at this? Thanks either way. Numerounovedant  Talk  19:16, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, . I'll do it soon and I hope you don't mind leaving some comments at Appian Way Productions, a short article but comprehensive, I believe. Nominated it for FA because I am obsessed with turning every GA in my FTs to FA. :D FrB.TG (talk) 07:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, of course. I'll take a look tonight​. Numerounovedant   Talk  07:45, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * A little reminder. Numerounovedant   Talk  18:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi,, I haven't forgotten about your FAC - I was going to comment there last week. But I have a terrible cold right now (due to the raining here) so it will be after a few days. – FrB.TG (talk) 20:22, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

J-Law TFAR
See Today's featured article/requests/Jennifer Lawrence for the nomination. Leaving a procedural notice since you've been a major contributor to the page. Feel free to edit the blurb if you think it could be better (as long as it doesn't exceed 1,200 characters). Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 21:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Vishwaroopam
My sixth attempt at a film accolades list for FLC, Frank. I have nominated the list here. Feel free to leave comments. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:15, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure, soon enough. – FrB.TG (talk) 20:22, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Nani filmography/archive1
This is my fourth attempt at a featured list. Feel free to leave comments if any. :)  Pavanjandhyala (talk)  18:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * , I shall look in at your nomination in a few days. In the meanwhile, would you mind reviewing Appian Way Productions, a relatively small article currently at FAC? It seems to have stalled there. No obligations though. – FrB.TG (talk) 21:08, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Will do it today evening.  Pavanjandhyala (talk)  01:08, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

RM at Talk:List of accolades received by La La Land (film)
Notifying you since you were the featured list nominator. An IP filed a request at RM/TR today to change the title of this page. I converted it to an RM rather than implement. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
You're welcome. – FrB.TG (talk) 05:31, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Jennifer Lawrence scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Jennifer Lawrence article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 15 August 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/August 15, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Appian Way Productions
Dropping by belatedly, I just wanted to say that your reaction to my oppose on this article is one of the best I've ever come across. It's very rare for a nominator to say: "Actually, you're right, I'll withdraw this and work on it some more". If everyone was so collegiate, FAC would run a lot more smoothly! Thanks for that, and let me know if I can be of any assistance when you get to looking at this. I'm not sure I can help on sourcing as I had a look myself when I reviewed, but you never know. Sarastro1 (talk) 12:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

List of accolades received by La La Land
Hi, I see you removed Ryan Gosling's image and I just wanted to say that he received nominations from several film critics organizations, as well as rave reviews for his performance in the film, like his co-star Emma Stone and director Damien Chazelle. If he had not received that many nominations then it would be right to not put his image but the fact is that he did received that amount of nominations and his image should be in the article. Now, if you think three images are overkill, we can reduce the size of the images but please, don not remove Ryan Gosling's image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.209.30.179 (talk) 00:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * , welcome to Wikipedia, I hope you find it a place worth spending your time on. I will be adding Perry and Grande's names in the Legacy section soon. Cheers – FrB.TG (talk) 07:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Lady Gaga's Legacy
There is this new article written by Hugh McIntyre from Forbes in which he claims that "Lady Gaga was one of the first artists currently helping usher in this new era with her latest album Joanne, which saw her put down the disco stick and pick up an acoustic guitar" and "Since then, a number of superstars have decided to stick with full bands and guitars [...] Miley Cyrus’ new single “Malibu” [...] while former One Direction member Harry Styles went one step further and dove headfirst into light glam rock with his first solo album and its lead single “Sign Of The Times.”" He is basically saying that like when 10 years ago Gaga brought back dance music to Top 40 with her debut album, now she's helping usher new acoustic era with her new album Joanne. I think that's interesting and would be a great fit for her legacy part. https://www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2017/08/16/lady-gaga-miley-kesha-top-40-pop-has-gone-acoustic-but-is-it-going-well/#81d63144e7fa

Plus similar article about this was written by Billboard. With 'Million Reasons,' Is Lady Gaga Bringing Back 'The Vocalist Era'? http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/7744316/with-million-reasons-is-lady-gaga-bringing-back-the-vocalist-era

In the legacy part after the sentence: In 2015, Time also noted that Gaga had "practically invented the current era of pop music as spectacle.", I would add: In August 2017, Hugh McIntyre from Forbes, credited Gaga for "helping usher in this new era with her latest album Joanne, which saw her put down the disco stick and pick up an acoustic guitar".

Please consider adding this. I think it's important for her legacy part, because she has always been a trendsetter. Thanks! By the way, why was Katy Perry removed from the list of artists? JoDash (talk) 01:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * KP got removed since the citation used didn't exactly show so much of an influence on her material or anything; it really was just comparing one of her outfits to what Gaga once wore. As for impact, trying to think of how much from those links is worth adding. <b style="color:#009900">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 17:05, 17 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I think that the Vanity Fair article is perfect citation because they are specifically saying how big of an influence and inspiration Gaga is to Katy and "it wouldn’t be the first time Perry has been inspired by Gaga.". There are more links on my post on the bottom of the page "Talk:Lady Gaga" in which other critics are saying how Katy was inspired by Gaga for her tour, interlude videos, merchandise designs.  It doesn't need to be said directly from Katy: "I am inspired by Gaga!" to see that she is inspired. Over the years Katy has shown so much love and admiration for Gaga, for example: https://twitter.com/katyperry/status/13351224809 On her Witness World Wide she said: "I would love Gaga to come but she's busy filming her film. I love her so much. She knows that. I want to see it.", then she also made a pancake with Gaga's face on it: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DCJWtL0XsAEHPtJ.jpg She also said in this next video about Gaga that "she is like the next Madonna, but better". Here is the link to the video at 0:30: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qt8LXMBY5oU There are so many sources in which the influence is obvious: http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/terminal01/2011/9/30/17/enhanced-buzz-32427-1317417793-1.jpg, https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bk_J5erCQAIMrUc.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DHnQG4DWsAIEjtP.jpg Inspiration and influence come in many forms. So, please consider re-adding Katy to the Legacy part. JoDash (talk) 23:31, 17 August 2017 (UTC)


 * As for the impact those links (From Forbes and Billboard) are very reliable and ever since the release of Joanne, many artists including Miley (With her whole image change, stripped down acoustic sound, use of cowboy hats, singing country inspired songs all of a sudden. Miley is no stranger of following Gaga's footsteps in terms of music, style choices. In 2015 she even started to dress like Gaga during her ARTPOP era ), Kesha (Article from The Atlantic: "Like Gaga with last year’s Joanne, Kesha trades thumping electro for analogue instruments and genres" and "Also like Gaga, she tries to execute this turn while tamping down, but not altogether ditching, her previous persona.". Here is the link: https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/08/kesha-rainbow-review-human-superhero/536355/), Harry Styles chose the same path. Gaga is credited for shifting the music in 2008 to dance, where top 40 radio was heavily hip hop, R&B influenced. Now they are acknowledging her impact on ushering acoustic / vocalist era in pop culture. JoDash (talk) 23:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)


 * There are literally 4 different magazines acknowledging Joanne's impact on the current music. Forbes, Billboard , The Atlantic , Glamour It isn't a coincidence, it's a fact. JoDash (talk) 23:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Gaga FAC
The article has come up beautifully. I don't know how you do it you sneaky little elf, but you don't create anything less than masterpieces do you? :P I have one suggestion. Do you think we might add one image from the Born This Way era? Because that was kind of the transition for Gaga. We can show the images in this way: An image from the said era where Gaga is shown at her craziest, and maybe replace the Artpop era with one from the Cheek to Cheek era, to show how she cleaned up her image and public persona. The captions reflecting them too. — I B  [ Poke  ] 04:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Haha, thanks - I'd wait for the admin to finish his comments. If he's satisfied with the article, we'll go to FAC. As for the images, I completely agree so go ahead. :-) – FrB.TG (talk) 06:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, have you thought of Madonna as your biggest challenge after Gaga? If not, we should haha. — I B  [ Poke  ] 04:41, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't dream of taking up an article I haven't contributed to in the slightest, especially one that is already in a good shape. It is also quite big for me. PS, should source the C2C caption. – FrB.TG (talk) 07:58, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Martine McCutcheon review
Hi, I have just expanded the 'Early life' section in this article. Its based on Martine's biography and I think that because of that it might not be written how we tend to write on Wikipedia. There's a lot of informations about her parents and it's hard to avoid mentioning their names a lot which makes it sound a bit informal I think. Could you possibly review my last edit in this article ? ArturSik (talk) 17:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

lady gaga revert
That's what I thought, that's why I've moved it to the left, cause it was below the one from cheek to cheek tour.


 * sorry, I've misread your comment. Just ignore me ;) ArturSik (talk) 18:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, as you are one of the main contributors of gagas article, could you resolve the issue with the infobox photo? Ive changed it to a different one as the one from Joanne tour was a non free license image, however my edits been reverted. ArturSik (talk) 11:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * It is not non-free. It's uploaded to commons, cited to Flickr where the author of the image has made it available for public use. – FrB.TG (talk) 11:23, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * My bad! It's not available for public use. Instead it says "All rights reserved". Thanks for taking care of it. – FrB.TG (talk) 18:08, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scarlett Johansson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Horse Whisperer ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Scarlett_Johansson check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Scarlett_Johansson?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Scarlett Johansson
I notice you removed model from her occupation. She has and does model look here at this. Please repair the page. Wlmg (talk) 18:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * That is not a reliable source and it's not unnormal for actresses to model for brands and products. Even if she is a model, I think it should be only present in the infobox. – FrB.TG (talk) 19:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)