User talk:Fraction7

This is for discussion.

Your submission at Articles for creation: VIYCE (January 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:VIYCE and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:VIYCE, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:VIYCE Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:VIYCE reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:VIYCE


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:VIYCE, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 21:06, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: VIYCE (January 19)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:VIYCE Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not for posting about your web film projects. If you think your film is notable, please find secondary sources independent of the subject that cover the film.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:59, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

VIYCE is not a web movie.
VIYCE is available for public distribution. I only put it on YouTube for free because nobody was buying it. My article on my movie was unbiased and accurate. I am not trying to "get the word out," as you put it. Rather, I am trying to make Wikipedia as complete as possible, since Wikipedia has no article for my film as of yet. It is absurd to prohibit a filmmaker from creating an article about his own film. If you wish to buy a DVD,. I see no reason why Wikipedia should have an article for this but not for this.

Your submission at Articles for creation: VIYCE (January 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:VIYCE and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:VIYCE, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:VIYCE Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:VIYCE reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:30, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: VIYCE (January 20)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:VIYCE Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Enough. By your own admission, it is not a notable film unless it gets promotion by Wikipedia.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:VIYCE
Draft:VIYCE, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:VIYCE and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:VIYCE during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:35, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Someone else will be along to review(and decline) this request, but please state what it is that you do not understand about "You cannot use Wikipedia to tell the world about your film" and "spam/advertising only account", the reason for the block. 331dot (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

I am not using Wikipedia to tell the world about my film, I am using Wikipedia to make Wikipedia more complete and accurate. I would not need to write an article on my film if somebody had already, but I can find no results for my film, so I can see that an article is in need of creation. Fraction7 (talk) 17:55, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The mere existence of your film does not merit it an article. Please read WP:NFILM for what does merit films an article here.  You have said elsewhere that no independent sources have written about your film, that means it cannot have an article here.  You have to get word out about your film in some other way.  331dot (talk) 18:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

I am not attempting to get word out about my film. I am only creating an article for a film which exists. It is an OK film. Not Citizen Kane, but a film nonetheless. Why does it matter that no newspapers have talked about my film? How can they if they do not know that it exists? Of course they will write about Vice by Adam McKay. He is famous! Lots of people have seen Vice by Adam McKay. My film, Viyce, is less well-known. This is not my fault. I made the film. Nobody has seen my movie. Since it is readily accessible, I have come to the conclusion that they do not wish to view my film. If they choose not to watch my film, that is their choice and I am not responsible if people refuse to watch my movie. It's a good movie nonetheless with a two hour runtime and a plot. Fraction7 (talk) 21:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I just wanted to note in light of the unblock request that this user has now been banned 3 times from the help channel and has continued to engage in evasion despite this but has also apparently made it their mission to continue to waste people's times. Their block has been thoroughly explained, multiple times as has the deletion. We've gotten far past WP:IDHT. Praxidicae (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

This is a lie- I only engage in constructive discussion. My only wish is an article for my film. It is an OK film. It exists. it's an Ok film. There should be an article for it. Fraction7 (talk) 22:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 22:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 00:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Since it is clear you are not hearing or just ignoring what you are being told, I have decided to remove talk page access. Any admin is free to restore it if they see merit in doing so. If your request is declined, you may use WP:UTRS to request unblock. 331dot (talk) 22:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)