User talk:Fragrant Peony/Archive 3

Thanks for welcoming me! 2600:387:F:5714:0:0:0:B (talk) 23:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Reverting and such
Don't forget when making reverts to ensure you are fully examining the contents of an edit. While this edit did contain unexplained content removals, it also corrected a spelling mistake which you inadvertently restored. Remember, we are fully responsible for the edits we make even if they are just reverts. { – MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 17:20, 7 May 2022 (UTC)


 * You are absolutely right! I mainly saw the removal of references and it being highlighted as a bad edit. Thanks a lot. Fragrant Peony (talk) 18:47, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Pirateboy123
Can you explain why you gave a final warning to Pirateboy123? Sdrqaz (talk) 19:11, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thought I removed their edit and got the semi-automated message, apparently someone else removed the edit. I'll remove the message. Fragrant Peony (talk) 22:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * That's not my point, Fragrant Peony. Their edits weren't vandalism. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:16, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Their edit here appeared as Vandalism at the Recent Changes page, I then went to their account and saw them getting reverted several times and wanted to restore the article to the latest version prior to their contributions. Fragrant Peony (talk) 00:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Transfermarkt
Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Alright, I won't cite it within sports articles. Thank you! Fragrant Peony (talk) 20:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Temptation Chiwunga


The article Temptation Chiwunga has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos  00:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Batwanes Beek for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Batwanes Beek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Batwanes Beek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. North8000 (talk) 00:30, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Isaac Caulker
Hello, Fragrant Peony

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bruxton, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Isaac Caulker, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit Edit the page]
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click the  button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And remember to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 19:28, 21 June 2022 (UTC)