User talk:Francescad

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

NPOV
This user is an employee of Clem Chambers and has frequent edit activity on his personal article and articles relating to him and his work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.84.221.203 (talk) 14:40, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Clem3.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Clem3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 03:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

The Armageddon Trade
Hello. You added the category British businesspeople to an article about a book. Please use categories which actually relate directly to the subject. Thanks. Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 13:15, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Article-march09.pdf
Thank you for uploading File:Article-march09.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet]  [talk]  14:01, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Article-march09.pdf
Thanks for uploading File:Article-march09.pdf I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.97.166 (talk) 01:46, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Twain Maxim
A tag has been placed on The Twain Maxim, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Clem Chambers
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Clem Chambers has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. Jan 1 naD (talk • contrib) 13:19, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kusanagi by Clem Chambers


A tag has been placed on Kusanagi by Clem Chambers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Borkificator (talk) 15:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 19:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello Francescad. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 19:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Armageddon Trade for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Armageddon Trade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Armageddon Trade until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 20:00, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Twain Maxim for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Twain Maxim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Twain Maxim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 20:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:ADVFN (logo).jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:27, 10 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Chambers-30a.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:17, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm Enivid. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Investing online because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Enivid (talk) 08:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Enivid,

I didn't realise Yahoo! Finance was an internal link. I have changed the ADVFN reference to an internal link also, so I assume this is ok as it now gives readers two sources for information.

Regards Francescad Francescad (talk) 09:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Baba Yaga
First, thank you for your effort to write about the book Granny Yaga on the Baba Yaga article. I appreciate that you're trying to improve Wikipedia, but I believe that mentioning that book would not improve the Baba Yaga article, as it is a novel that only features a fictional character similar to Baba Yaga. These sorts of mentions typically belong to a Popular culture section, if the article has one, and even if Baba Yaga were famous enough in pop culture that it warranted a mention in the article, the novel you reference came out this year and hardly had any time to influence it.

On Wikipedia, an often used procedure when you disagree with a new change to the article is to revert it and discuss it with the person who did it. I'm writing this here in case you didn't see my edit summaries when I reverted your edits. Daß &thinsp; Wölf 17:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Wölf Hi, I appreciate the time you've taken to contact me. The book begins with a very faithful portrayal of the story of Baba Yaga: Koschei the deathless, the hut on chicken legs and the Krivichi tribe. It then shows a different side to the character. I therefore felt it was pertinent. The book is firmly rooted with the tradition. Francescad (talk) 18:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Francescad


 * Thanks for responding, I'm glad that you're willing to discuss this :) Just one thing, you should indent your responses on talk pages with colons, . That way it's easier to see who said what.
 * About the book, it's nice that the book is a faithful portrayal, but that in itself is not enough to warrant a mention in the Baba Yaga article. There have been many books, films, etc., featuring Baba Yaga with more or less verisimilitude, and if we included even just the better ones, the list would soon get out of control. For example, a few dozen are listed here, and that list is still lacking. To fix this issue, Wikipedia generally requires reliable third-party secondary sources that are relevant to the article topic. For example, a top quality source for the edit you made would be a scholarly work, whose author(s) are unrelated to the book author and publisher(s), that discusses portrayals of Baba Yaga in modern literature. In reality, we often have to do with less, but simply referencing the book itself is citing a primary source, which is not sufficient here.
 * P.S. I see some editors have alleged that you have a connection with some of the subjects of articles you have edited. If that's the case, you should read Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest and paid editing. Generally, editors are discouraged from working on articles where they have a conflict of interest, as this often leads to problems retaining a neutral point of view. Daß &thinsp; Wölf 00:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoia Skoropadenko (February 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zoia Skoropadenko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  22:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zoia Skoropadenko has been accepted
 Zoia Skoropadenko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  Programming Geek talk to me 17:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Clem Chambers nominated for deletion
Please see the discussion here for more details: Articles for deletion/Clem Chambers FOARP (talk) 13:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:ADVFN Plc logo.png


The file File:ADVFN Plc logo.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned file. Has no use on wikipedia since there is no article on ADVFN."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 19:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chambers-30a.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chambers-30a.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 08:27, 31 July 2022 (UTC)