User talk:Francewhoa/Archived 2017

= March 2017 =

Posting same copy-and-pasted content on multiple article talk pages
Hi. It was not necessary or helpful for you to copy-and-paste the same text on five different article talk pages, as you did here, here, here, and here, and here. That kind of posting pattern is likely to be viewed by other editors as spam-like.

If you think that a topic is relevant to multiple pages, the correct thing to do is to bring it to a noticeboard or to post it on one talk page, with a short note left on other talk pages pointing to the original discussion. Please read WP:TALKCENT: Talk_page_guidelines. I would appreciate it if you were to remove your duplicative comments, so as not to force other editors to repeat themselves over and over. Neutralitytalk 23:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi Neutrality :) I agree that a central discussion on one article talk page seems easier. Easy is good. Thanks for the suggestion. I updated those article talk pages accordingly.
 * As for my user talk page, I'm assuming you missed that introduction. Which reads "On this page I welcome friendly discussions related to the content of my Wikipedia user page. As for discussions related to edits of Wikipedia articles, I suggest to use the talk page on each Wikipedia article." Feel really free to use your user page in any way convenient for you. Speaking for myself I prefer using article talk pages for discussion related to articles, and using my user talk page for discussions about my user page. Francewhoa (talk) 01:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi SineBot :) Thanks for that information. It's concise and well written. I was familiar with how to sign my posts though. I'm assuming you're referring to my today posts such as |that talk page post. If so, notice that I actually did sign my first original posts you're referring to. On that talk page my signature reads "22:49, 29 March 2017 (UTC)" After I signed my posts on those talk pages, roughly minutes later, I added an additional source to my post. Since my original post was already signed and nobody had yet replied I didn't see the point of signing again my updated first post.
 * As for my user talk page, I'm assuming you missed that introduction. Which reads "On this page I welcome friendly discussions related to the content of my Wikipedia user page. As for discussions related to edits of Wikipedia articles, I suggest to use the talk page on each Wikipedia article." Feel really free to use your user page in any way convenient for you. Speaking for myself I prefer using article talk pages for discussion related to articles, and using my user talk page for discussions about my user page.
 * Francewhoa (talk) 02:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * you do know that sinebot is.. well... a bot. there's not a person doign the edits, lol. it can't read the notice -- Aunva6talk - contribs 02:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

= April 2017 =

Guccifer 2, a DNC creatur
Long read, but worth it: http://g-2.space/ "Adam Carter: Guccifer 2.0: Game Over", a collection of Guccifer 2 primary source statements and timeline → The DNC itself created fake "Russian" Guccifer 2. --87.159.124.244 (talk) 15:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi 87.159.124.244 :) Thanks for that information
 * As for my user talk page, I'm assuming you missed that introduction. Which reads "On this page I welcome friendly discussions related to the content of my Wikipedia user page. As for discussions related to edits or information about Wikipedia articles, I suggest to use the talk page on each Wikipedia article." Feel really free to use your user page in any way convenient for you. Speaking for myself I prefer using article talk pages for discussion related to articles, and using my user talk page for discussions about my user page.
 * Francewhoa (talk) 21:25, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of United Basketball Alliance of India
Hello Francewhoa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged United Basketball Alliance of India for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

-- Aunva6talk - contribs 15:38, 30 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi ) Thanks for your message and Wiki contributions :) My reply is on |that article talk page.
 * As for my user talk page, I'm assuming you missed that introduction. Which reads "On this page I welcome friendly discussions related to the content of my Wikipedia user page. As for discussions related to edits or information about Wikipedia articles, I suggest to use the talk page on each Wikipedia article." Feel really free to use your user page in any way convenient for you. Speaking for myself I prefer using article talk pages for discussion related to articles, and using my user talk page for discussions about my user page. Francewhoa (talk) 23:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
 * it's an automatic notification. it's also required by the template. i'll take the template off, but you should take a look at WP:CSD, it explains the whole process -- Aunva6talk - contribs 02:30, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

= May 2017 =

Notice
SPECIFICO talk  15:28, 3 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi ) Thanks for your message and your Wiki contributions :) Today I read your message. I would love to discuss but I don't understand your message. Could you please clarify what you're referring to? Are you referring to an Wikipedia article or to my personal Wikipedia user page?
 * If you're referring to a Wikipedia article, I'm assuming that in good faith you missed that introduction. Which reads "On this page I welcome friendly discussions related to the content of my Wikipedia user page. As for discussions related to edits or information about Wikipedia articles, I suggest to use the talk page on each Wikipedia article." Feel really free to use your user page in any way convenient for you. Speaking for myself I prefer using article talk pages for discussion related to articles, and using my user talk page for discussions about my user page. Francewhoa (talk) 01:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello. Please follow the links in the Notice and then if you have any questions or comments, you may post them here or you may ask any Admin for clarification. The notice does not refer to any specific edits or discussions on a particular article.  SPECIFICO  talk  18:45, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Saoud al-Daweesh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saoud al-Daweesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Saoud al-Daweesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pontificalibus (talk) 06:55, 21 November 2017 (UTC)