User talk:Francisgreenleaf

January 2023
Hello Francisgreenleaf. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Francisgreenleaf. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi MrOllie - while i do work in medical virtual reality professionally, my intention in making these edits is to advance knowledge of this topic on wikipedia, not to promote individual interests. Is this permissible? Francisgreenleaf (talk) 22:27, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Please read the guidelines linked in the above message thoroughly, you are probably in violation of Wikipeda's terms of use. - MrOllie (talk) 23:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Upon further review I do not believe I am in conflict. I am currently a freelance consultant in this space, not working or being compensated by any company or research institution cited in my previous edits. Could you point specifically to an edit that is in violation of the terms of use? Francisgreenleaf (talk) 23:33, 5 January 2023 (UTC)