User talk:Franck555

Speedy deletion nomination of Fabio apelbaum


A tag has been placed on Fabio apelbaum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. BurtAlert (talk) 21:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fabio Apelbaum


The article Fabio Apelbaum has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Mhiji 21:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy tags
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 22:42, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Fabio Apelbaum. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Safiel (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JDDJS (talk) 23:44, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 00:18, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Your best chance of being unblocked is to convince the reviewing administrator that you will stop writing autobiographies and instead make constructive contributions. Hey  Mid  (contribs) 19:01, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * You should get acquainted with our conflict of interest and neutral point of view policies. In short, we don't get to edit Wikipedia articles about ourselves, our companies, or our employees. --jpgordon:==( o ) 21:51, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * By the way, you repeatedly refer to "co-workers." While we do indeed try to work together, please be aware that we are all volunteers who donate our time and effort to maintain and improve this website. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:58, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * To but it very bluntly: you are what's wrong with the article. You have a conflict of interest. You have an interest in promoting/memorialising this person, but that is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Your desire is adminrable, but it's not what Wikipedia is for. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   01:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know how you could not understand what is meant by "removing speedy deletion notices" since you did it so many times. It's in reference to any edit where you remove a speedy deletion tag from an article you have created yourself. You did this four times before the article was deleted, and were repeatedly warned not to do it. Additionally, the notice you recieved informing you of the speedy nomination clearly says "Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself." So your claim that nobody tried to educate you is false, you just failed to understand the plainly worded notices to stop, which are still visible on this very page. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:52, 8 January 2011 (UTC)