User talk:Franckn55

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Bejinhan Talk   10:16, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Chinict
A tag has been placed on Chinict, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bejinhan Talk   10:16, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Chinict
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
 * Place  on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * Make your case on the article's .

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:26, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:CHINICT.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CHINICT.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:29, 14 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:29, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Hello, I have full ownership of these pictures CHINICT.jpg and CHINICT.pdf and I agree to have it freely used on Wikipedia. I hope that gives an end to this issue. Thanks for your kind understanding. I am still new to Wikipedia. Franckn55 (talk) 17:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:CHINICT.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:CHINICT.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:29, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello, I have full ownership of this picture and I agree to have it freely used on Wikipedia. I hope that gives an end to this issue. Thanks for your kind understanding. I am still new to Wikipedia. Franckn55 (talk) 17:08, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:CHINICT.pdf
Thanks for uploading File:CHINICT.pdf. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:29, 14 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:29, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Hello, I have full ownership of this picture and I agree to have it freely used on Wikipedia. I hope that gives an end to this issue. Thanks for your kind understanding. I am still new to Wikipedia. Franckn55 (talk) 17:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello, I have full ownership of this picture and I agree to have it freely used on Wikipedia. I hope that gives an end to this issue. Thanks for your kind understanding. I am still new to Wikipedia. Franckn55 (talk) 17:07, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello, I have full ownership of this picture and I agree to have it freely used on Wikipedia. I hope that gives an end to this issue. Thanks for your kind understanding. I am still new to Wikipedia. Franckn55 (talk) 17:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:CHINICT.pdf)
 Thanks for uploading File:CHINICT.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 16:29, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick feedback. However, I still cannot find where and how I can solve the problem. In other words, I cannot find where I could give the correct source, the license and the fair use rationale for each of the images. I have put the image with the correct source and license on the wikipedia commons (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CHINICT.pdf) - but for some reason, I am not able to use it in the wikipedia article. Thank you for your support and understanding. Franckn55 (talk) 07:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Image problems
You will need to go to each of the images cited above and fix all of the issues that are listed on those pages - and do it on the page itself, not here; give the correct source for the image (website), the license, and the fair use rationale for each of them. The instructions on where to find them can be found by following the links on those pages. Skier Dude ( talk ) 23:53, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello Bob - The 'Tech Chinization' category reflects a societal and business phenomenon that is currently taking global innovation and entrepreneurship by storm and that is supported by major players in this industry. Therefore it should be represented in an encyclopedic source such as Wikipedia - which is at the forefront of classical and new knowledge of universal significance and reach. Hopefully these explanation will clarify potential doubts on this issue. All the best, Franckn55 (talk) 21:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello Bob - The 'Tech Chinization' category reflects a societal and business phenomenon that is currently taking global innovation and entrepreneurship by storm and that is supported by major players in this industry. Therefore it should be represented in an encyclopedic source such as Wikipedia - which is at the forefront of classical and new knowledge of universal significance and reach. Hopefully these explanation will clarify potential doubts on this issue. All the best, Franckn55 (talk) 21:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Tech Chinization
I have nominated tech chinization for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Simple Bob (talk) 13:14, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

disruptive editing
I have reversed your undoing of my edits to CHINICT, and I have again explained, in each individual case, why these edits were made. You have failed to substantively addressed the issues, which in many cases are very basic. They concern grammar, they concern the suggestion that the page is nothing but advertising, they concern valid issues raised by other editors. Removing templates, for instance, without actually doing something to the article that would alleviate these concerns, is bad manners and constitutes disruptive editing. This is a friendly piece of advice: rather than simply reversing or striking an inappropriate tone in edit summaries ("What is it you still not understand?"), address the issues. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:56, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Third or fourth removal of perfectly valid notability, COI, and advertisement templates. Drmies (talk) 18:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

For some reason, in the very article, you have not been able to visualize that I had actually already taken into account your previous comments regarding basic and semantic edits. I will therefore redo these edits taking into account again most of your comments on basic grammar and semantics. Hopefully this new editing of the article will now address your concerns. I did not mean to strike "an inappropriate tone" in any ways (BTW, in my last editing, I had already rephrased the explanations regarding "chinization"). The companies mentioned are just the backers of the conference as well as of the phenomenon of "chinization" and are not meant to be promotional in any ways (realistically none of the mentioned companies needs additional promotion as they are all very established entities). As a matter of facts, the different references accompanying each company name, feature relevant information I invite you to consult if you have time - as they clearly establish the notability of the topic of the article. FYI, the only one reason why I decided to write this article was to answer a very large number of requests enticing me to do so. Although I am not familiar with Wikipedia and not an English native speaker (as you may have understood by now ;-)), I am doing my best to make it appealing and interesting to the Wikipedia audience - even though it has already taken far too much of my time and energy. Thank you. Franckn55 (talk) 18:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Regarding those "explain" templates, simply removing them is not the way to go. If these are linguistic problems, ask someone else if you don't know what is being asked. I see now you've changed 'event' to 'conference' and that is a start, although it does not yet explain enough: is there a private company whose sole mission, so to speak, is organizing this conference? If you want an article to remain, it is a good idea to have a short, to the point, and factually supported article, rather than produce something that (by now) half a dozen different editors have problems with--and not address their issues. Articles here are (usually) built by cooperation, and policies and guidelines are adopted by consensus. The editors who have remarked, in various ways, on the article are not out on some personal vendetta--their objective is to make the encyclopedia better. When, for instance, policies are cited to support an editor's actions, it is a good idea to acquaint yourself with those policies--and, in light of a few of my own last edits, that means, for instance, a look at WP:RS. Good luck, Drmies (talk) 20:06, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of CHINICT
I have nominated CHINICT, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/CHINICT. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Simple Bob (talk) 12:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of CHINICT
I have nominated CHINICT, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/CHINICT. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Simple Bob (talk) 12:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * On the same subject, Basically the reasons as cited by the editors at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CHINICT page due to lack of notability of the subject but especially and also in some areas it looked like an advertisement (when I reviewed the article on the deleted version). Seems it was a good consensus even though I would have hope for more discussion, but no other people seem to be trying to save the page from deletion in that discussion other then yourself. --JForget 01:09, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:File:CHINICT.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:File:CHINICT.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Simple Bob (talk) 07:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)