User talk:Frank1829

Suggestion
Your first edits today were good, but the second wave might get both edits reverted. Try adding some sources to what you already edited. -- ♥ pashtun ismailiyya  00:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. ''Nothing personal, but edit in good faith. Thanks!'' JMS Old Al (talk) 01:44, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Umar
hi, if i am not mistaking you added the mawali policy stuff in the Caliph Umar's article. This claim has been challanged here in Talk:Umar discuss it here before adding it back to the article. The claim of mawali policy sound purely shia belive and some thing fabricated in later years or more recently as it strongly conflicts with umar's classic biographies and early muislim and non-muslim byzantine sources that remmembers umar for his justice and equality for all subjects. Mohammad Adil (talk) 13:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Stop vandalizing Umar's page or you will be banned
You are hereby warned against your continuous attempts at vandalizing Umar page. The old version that contains a paragraph already agreed against and proven to contain false evidence and references, numerous spelling and stylistic errors and deficiencies that have been improved over time, deleting properly referenced material, not to mention that the version mentions the same story twice verbatim in two places of the article. This is your one and only warning. If you continue to do so you will be banned, what you are doing is called edit warring and vandalism. If you have any new material you are to discuss it on the discussion page before adding it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sampharo (talk • contribs) 13:28, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

final warning
, This is a final warning or you will be blocked from editing wikipedia. You have already violated W:TRR policy, do it one more time and you will be responsible for the consequences.

Mohammad Adil (talk) 14:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * now just wait till you permanently got blocked.......

Edit warring warning
WARNING! You have already been blocked once. If you continue behaving this way you will be blocked permenantly. You have performed Edit Warring WP:EW as well as more specifically Disruptive Editing WP:DISRUPT. You are directly heading towards a permenant ban.

--Sampharo (talk) 18:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't understand this warning. The block log shows nothing. What do you (S) mean? William M. Connolley (talk) 23:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Frank1829 hasn't been blocked. Sampharo is referring to this. Which I later removed. It was a simple mistake by Mohammad adil. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 06:31, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:39, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Various wise pieces of advice
Hi. You're new here, you need to learn our ways if you want to have any hope of influencing content, which I presume you do, or else you wouldn't be here. First, please read and understand WP:CIVIL; breaking that is one easy way of getting blocked. Second be aware of WP:3RR. Third, please don't post messages to user pages, use the talk pages instead. Questions? Please ask them here William M. Connolley (talk) 23:08, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Frank1829, I would agree with WM Connolley above that you may need to tone things down a bit. A few of your most recent comments can be seen as uncivil, and this does not help when trying to work through a dispute. Concentrate on discussing the issues at hand and not people, and you might find things a lot more easier to deal with. Please refer to Civility and No personal attacks. Regards,  ITAQALLAH   11:40, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)