User talk:Frank6292010/Warnings

February 2021
You really need to work on your edits, particularly formatting in infoboxes. Perhaps a trip to the Teahouse will set you straight. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, NJTV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

I can't change the top Frank6292010 (talk) 19:49, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Go to njtvonline.org and it's now NJ PBS Frank6292010 (talk) 19:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

About my edits
My edits were constructive and in good faith. I was merely correcting your errors. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:47, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:04, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Mvcg66b3r. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

I will after you say sorry Mvcg66b3r and I will stop

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to WCBS-TV, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive.   BlueboyLINY (talk) 04:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to WABC-TV. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions.   BlueboyLINY (talk) 04:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:Frank6292010, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.   BlueboyLINY (talk) 05:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

"I own New York"
Stop that. You both need to back away, and don't demand apologies.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:47, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to User talk:BlueboyLINY, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 12:57, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:41, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:BlueboyLINY, you may be blocked from editing.   BlueboyLINY (talk) 08:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:BlueboyLINY, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.   BlueboyLINY (talk) 05:43, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Trey Maturin has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —— Serial  11:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Wrong reverts
This and this give a wrong reason for reverting, which is a misuse of automated editing tools. Additionally, your reverts have merely added back two words that are being used illiterately. Not cool. ◦ Trey Maturin 15:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.◦ Trey Maturin 16:00, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Fences &amp;  Windows  14:48, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Your editing is becoming increasingly erratic and disruptive. Just this month: you're warning people about edits using irrelevant edit summaries that say you're using tools like RedWarn when you don't use them, you're disrupting the admin noticeboard, you're misreading (they didn't say the station was superfluous, they said the two words they remived were superfluous) and harassing an editor over it, you're getting in spats with other editors (see AN/I passim, immaturely parroting the complaint against you and making a legal threat), you're deliberately trying to get revenge on another editor, and you're adding unsourced content. If you continue to display WP:BATTLEGROUND behaviour, such as incorrect warnings or edit summaries, pretending to use tools, edit warring, revenge editing, or disruption to noticeboards and talk pages, you will be blocked again. You also need to start always citing reliable sources when you add or change content and using edit summaries when you make article edits. Fences  &amp;  Windows  15:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Message from 68.132.101.188
you have been reported due to your edit warring, you have now deleted my comments on your talk page twice, you have not responded here or at my talk page about the article, I even gave you the sources and shown you both sources were greenlighted at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources and during this whole time you have not made a single effort to even look at the content at hand — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.132.101.188 (talk • contribs)

Message from 68.132.101.188
you have been reported due to your edit warring, you have now deleted my comments on your talk page twice, you have not responded here or at my talk page about the article, I even gave you the sources and shown you both sources were greenlighted at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources and during this whole time you have not made a single effort to even look at the content at hand — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.132.101.188 (talk • contribs)