User talk:FrankCastle74

Welcome!
Hello, FrankCastle74, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome! Grayfell (talk) 08:34, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

edit warring
You are a single purpose account whose only purpose is to edit in some irrelevant nonsense into an article about a company/product you don't like. You are of course most likely someone who has edit warred there before, just with a new name. If something does not have a WP:reliable source referenced as saying it, it won't be allowed in any Wikipedia article.  D r e a m Focus  11:45, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

The edits that have been made are accurate, verifiable facts and are meant to produce a more complete picture about this 'product' so that readers understand more fully the overall concept and it's present state of development.
 * I happen to agree. The problem is, you need to include reliable, secondary sources, WP:RS, otherwise it's becomes the burden of the reader to determine how accurate and verifiable those facts are. Youtube videos are not usable for this kind of thing, because, as I'm sure you've noticed, anybody can publish a video saying any nonsense they want with no editorial oversight WP:SPS. A good place to discuss this is the article's talk page. Grayfell (talk) 07:29, 12 August 2014 (UTC)