User talk:Frankfedit

September 2020
Hello, I'm Paisarepa. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Dodecanese have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Paisarepa (talk) 05:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dodecanese, you may be blocked from editing. Paisarepa (talk) 05:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Dodecanese.  Gwen Hope  (talk) (contrib) 06:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Dodecanese. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.  // Timothy ::  talk  06:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring
Hello. unfortunately, you seem to be engaged in an edit war on Dodecanese. Three other editors have objected to your removal of sourced content and you have been requested to discuss the issue on the article talk page. Other editors are aware of this policy and because you're new, I wanted to make sure you were also. Before you continue, I would read BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, Consensus, Editing policy, and Edit warring. If you have any questions, please post them here and add to your question (this will let me know you left a question/reply). Thanks,  // Timothy ::  talk  07:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi.
 * The specific content that i edited was related to Wikipedia's article promoting national extremism. The article was claiming the existence of national minority in a state, without presenting references on International Treaties or scientific (peer-reviewed) articles. As you can understand, this triggers national extremism. Sorry for being bothered for Wikipedia's neutrality and trying to protect its credibility. Of course the biases presented in this wikipedia page was reported to the Administration and the government of the country being affected.
 * Just FYI: Treaties and official documents are not required to be a ethnic minority. Removal of sourced content is generally frowned upon. You got a 24h block this time, continue this behavior and the block will be longer or even indefinite. Kleuske (talk) 07:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)