User talk:Frankie0607

Warning messages
It is good to warn users when someone has reverted and forgot to do the warning themselves. However, people using automated tools like Huggle (HG) and Twinkle (TW) usually warn as a part of the revert process and additional warnings are not necessary. --NrDg 23:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey sorry about that, Just twinkle confirmed that I was reverting it, So I put the message there. Most other times Twinkle will not allow me to revert, or add warning's, as it knows someone else has reverted already. Its a flaw in twinkle, which can be seen on there page noting that 2 users can revert at the same time. Thanks for your support --Frankie0607 (talk) 23:58, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah it is - it has happened me a bunch of times too. Just as long as you are aware of what is going on. Twinkle is a great tool but it has some funny behaviors some times to it is always a good idea to check on what it did before you trust it too much. Good to have an other vandal fighter. --NrDg 00:02, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much dude, I had a slippery start, But I'm back wiser, and ready to fight vandals, Your support is very welcome here, Thanks NrDg. --Frankie0607 (talk) 00:07, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Thanks
No problem, you have a happy holidays =) Inferno,   Lord of   Penguins  01:23, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


 * They keep doing it, Ah well, they are annoyed we ruin they're fun :) --Frankie0607 (talk) 01:24, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it just shows you that your reverts have not gone unoticed...they get themselves blocked. Inferno,   Lord of   Penguins  01:26, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

70.171.182.19
I have reported that user to AIV. -- IRP ☎ 01:28, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Its about time, Hes annoyed I ruin his vandalising fun, Thanks for the help.--Frankie0607 (talk) 01:30, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. -- IRP ☎ 01:31, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

user page vandalism
I noticed you have got yourself a vandal fan. If you would like I can protect your user page against IP edits. --NrDg 01:28, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


 * That would be fantastic NrDg, Thank you for your continued support, Happy Christmas :)--Frankie0607 (talk) 01:30, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. --NrDg 01:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Fantastic, Thanks --Frankie0607 (talk) 01:33, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Well
Stop vandalizing Tom Green article, please. 83.24.178.78 (talk) 16:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You have consistantly vandalised the page, I am simply reverting them --  Frankie0607  16:38, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem. Thank you for your efforts on this. – xeno  ( talk ) 16:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! – xeno  ( talk ) 17:01, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback can be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback may be removed at any time.
 * Thanks very much, I will get to work. --  Frankie0607  17:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You got the hang of HG! :-) -- Menti  fisto  17:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah Im loving it! :) --  Frankie0607  18:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Signature
You might want to adjust it so it doesn't create a new line for your name.  Enigma msg  18:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The issue appears to be the  and   which force your sig into its own paragraph.  If you remove them, your sig will stay on the same line as the rest of your message. — Kralizec! (talk) 19:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The problem has been resolved, Thanks for the help guys. -- Frankie  0607 19:31, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

---

Edit
I was fixing the page. It said "day icon" when it meant "gay icon." I will fix it back. K thanks. 76.77.225.169 (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, Easy mistake to make on my part, Apolgise -- Frankie  0607  01:23, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

no problem :) 76.77.225.169 (talk) 01:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Category:Ballerinas‎
Thank you for tending to Category:Ballerinas‎. — Robert Greer (talk) 17:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, Pleasure to be of assistance. -- Frankie 0607  18:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Thomas R. Vozzella
I do not know how Wikipedia works. Please help me and make the article go away. It has become a liability to Dr. Vozzella. Thanks. MusicTex (talk) 13:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, The article in question has already been considered for deletion, and Is currently in the process of being reviewed. Simply deleting the Article is unnacceptable and goes agianst the process of deletion. Please understand that the article must be carefully reviewed, before the step of deleting it is taken. Any more help feel free to ask. -- Frankie 0607  13:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Stop this bot
Please stop this bot, it's reverting at will.--Nutriveg (talk) 14:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This account is not a bot, and follows policies when reverting. Thanks for your concerns. -- Frankie 0607  14:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Please explain which policy was followed here?--Nutriveg (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Please do spend a little more time examining each edit before reverting it, the above quoted edit was clearly constructive, and simply shuffled information around in a more logical fashion. –xeno talk 14:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You suggested a large amount of reverts were wrong. In this case the revert may not have totally been correct, I apolgise for doing so, But 99.9% of my reverts are totally accurate. In some case huggle jumps to the next edit, while you are still looking at another edit. I may have reverted edit thinking it was a different article. But to suggest all my reverts are inaccurate, and I should be stopped is out of order. Thanks for the concern. -- Frankie 0607  14:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

An explanation:

Both of these reverts "collided" as huggle displayed the next edit ontop of the last one: '
 * 14:35, 20 April 2009 (hist) (diff) m Prostate cancer ‎ (Reverted edits by Nutriveg to last revision by AnomieBOT (HG))
 * 14:35, 20 April 2009 (hist) (diff) m Cosmic microwave background radiation ‎ (Reverted edits by 67.52.48.226 to last revision by Zorrobot (HG)) (top) [rollback]'

Sorry again -- Frankie 0607  15:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It happens, just try to keep a close eye on this. –xeno talk 15:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome
Considering that user's post, I didn't think you'd mind. I do appreciate the positive feedback...meddling with others' talk pages is a tricky business. See ya 'round  Tide  rolls  20:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah was very kind of you, I had mindless vandalism to User Pages... Thanks for your eagle eye :D -- Frankie 0607  14:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Daddy Yankee
Hey There's This one person vandilizing daddy yankee's article by talking trash. Arcangel Viveros 13:22, 21 September 2009 (UTC) OO I get it so does it still say what that other guy put or is it fixed.Arcangel Viveros 13:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Daddy Yankee
so do i have to leave you a new message every time or can i continue the same one. Arcangel Viveros 13:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
(Deleted warning)


 * It appears that you have made a mistake in your reverting, as clearly i was reverting a piece of vandalism, So you have infact reverted the page back to a state of vandalism, if these acts continue i will have to report you on the basis that you are misusing huggle --<em style="font-family:Impact"> Frankie 0607  15:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry. While Huggle is a great tool, it ain't perfect, and I think this edit demonstrates that. Not sure how that happened (possibly user error), but I see you have reverted to the correct version. Of course, I have deleted the false warning here, and again, my apologies. Jusda  fax  15:50, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Was trying to create a Jesus Culture page, not Jesus Culture Band page...
Sorry... I was puzzled why the new page I created "Jesus Culture" was redirected to a separate page "Jesus Culture Band". Sorry if I deleted the wrong thing.RichLindvall (talk) 18:46, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No problems, I saw your note in the history that you intended to create a page saying simply "Jesus Culture" rather than "Jesus Culture (Band)", Please note you must not create Wikipedia pages for personal bands, The band or person must be notable, Thanks --<em style="font-family:Impact"> Frankie 0607  18:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! Actually, though, this page is not about a band at all but rather a youth organization. Would you mind looking at the content and then restoring my page--Jesus Culture? Respectfully submitted...RichLindvall (talk) 18:51, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Do you wish to create a page called "Jesus Culture" for your youth organisation? Please note the guidlines for creating your first article, and what you must do to make it a valid article --<em style="font-family:Impact"> Frankie 0607  18:56, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!RichLindvall (talk) 22:54, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

One author requesting blanking
Recently you reverted a 's blanking of a page that essentially they were the only author of (Off2riorob's edits were solely to place prod and g12 copyright violation notices). When a page is blanked by the author, it counts as a request by the author for deletion and shouldn't be treated like vandalism. You aren't the only one who I've seen do this to users, so I want to make sure to remind editors that they should take more care in their warnings and reversions. Cheers. Syrthiss (talk) 11:56, 29 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for updating me of the cituation, I will not revert any further edits to this page if he is working on it, Thanks --<em style="font-family:Impact"> Frankie 0607  11:58, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for looking after my talk page there, I could barely keep up! -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 11:58, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No problems, If any further vandalism continues you can have you page protected, or semi protected, Ill keep an eye on you page :) --<em style="font-family:Impact"> Frankie 0607  12:00, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Yes!
Looks like you got your login ID and everything back! Whoop! (:  I'm Flightx52 and I approve this message  05:31, 4 December 2010 (UTC) Im always right. ;)

mistak
I haven't edit anything be4....:( I hav recive a wrong message.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.205.193.128 (talk) 17:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

New Usercheck
Hello: if you are receiving this, you have transcluded, I have created a Usercheck with more content, that I plan to update with more when I come across it, as of right now Usercheck-Super has only three more things than Usercheck-full, but as mentioned, I plan to update it, the three things I mentioned are pending changes log, giving all of the revisions you have accepted or rejected, Abuse filter, which gives you the ability to examine your edits, and get many details about an edit, along with Articles created, which links to a page which gives a breakdown of all the pages you have made. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 122.57.56.125 (talk) 20:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)