User talk:Franklove

hang on I don't understand shakespeare fan 00 when he says that this is not an agency, what kind of administrator is this, it seems as if his mind is in the gutter or somthing, what is he thinking about the whore he was with last night? no one is asking for agency services, just for this artist judith to get the recognition she deserves and is being denied by shakespearefan 00

Also, this is an independent artist, lets stop this corporate hating, hey shakespeare, which record label do you work for? seems like you are trying to erase this artist from wikipedia

Everything that I put up about judith is deleted or erased and I wonder why?

Didn't know that she was loved and admired and envied so much

Somehow, i know if Judith were one of the cussing rappers, she could easily get a bio on here, its just no room for positive music, every song must be somthing negative and degrading, especially when it comes to black women

Fair use rationale for Image:Judith_Mitchell_Eni_Mini_Mighty_Moe!.jpg
the use of this image is fair because the artist is giving me permission to upload her content this image is available worldwide on www.cdbaby.com/judithonline2 www.judithonline.net www.myspace.com/judithonline everywhere but on here

meanwhile, wikipedia is too complicated, it needs to be simplified everything on this site is not understandable, it gives the impression of persons who just want to be smart, but in actuality, really aren't that bright Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Judith_Mitchell_Eni_Mini_Mighty_Moe!.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 10:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

hang on

there goes the plantation driver shakespeare again, picking at this artist this is a very talented young lady and she deserves her article on here stop hating shakespeare

Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg
Sources: www.cdbaby.com/judithonline2 Judith Mitchell

Copyright Info: Copyright March 2006 Copyright#SRU0030098

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: WP:Not an agency To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:52, 30 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The blurb you added to the image description read like a release a talent agency might put out, Wikipedia is NOT

a 'talent' agency. Judith is very anti talent agency, in fact, she is against "ownership" completely. a talent agency deals with models and actresses, not singers. Now, the content I read about singers who have their bio up, sounds just like a record label promoting their artist. So, if the price is right, anyone can put up a bio about a singer right? ShakespeareFan00 11:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Judith Mitchell The Hardest Part Album small.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg. The copy called Image:Judithonline2 small.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 11:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou Staeckerbot!

Theres a thing called demon running around and making threats on wikipedia and then calling persons of color, "uncivil". how double edged

This thing needs to be locked up immediately for spreading censorship and then having the audasidy to accuse the righteous of being uncivil, with a name like demon, one can only imagine its real purpose for wikipedia.

Meanwhile, it is openly gay and a student! Think it has a lot more growing to do, if you get my wift

Blocked
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.