User talk:Frankus05

Wallcreeper
Thanks for message
 * the first and only&mdash;promotional language
 *  Frank Neveu... Salamandre film 2013  &mdash; film maker's name is fair enough, why do we need the production company?
 * Contrary to what you said, there was a "buy the DVD" link
 * Your site shows only short promotional clips, not the full film, obviously intended as trailers to buy
 * This seems to be your only contribution to Wikipedia, which suggests you wish to promote the film rather than help the project
 * We get this all the time with photographers, who put a link to their galleries, which have a "buy the print" option. I remove their links too
 * Photographers who genuinely want to help the project release their images for us to use, sometimes at a reduced size
 * There is nothing to stop you releasing the the trailer clips to Wikipedia under the licence shown at the bottom of your page&mdash;if your intention is really to help us, and not just use us as a platform to advertise your film. I don't doubt that it is everything you claim it to be, but that still doesn't mean that we are going to promote it for you  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

My purpose by making this movie was to make know this wonderful bird in its natural environment to make sensitive the largest number in the beauty of the nature. I am a protector of the nature by my first job. The movie is ended and I do not have financial interest anymore in the sale of this movie but I am persuaded that the person who wishes to know the wallcreeper would gain to see the behavior of the bird in the trailer and why not to see the movie. The video images of the link towards the trailer are free and new and are worth being seen by the lovers of birds, we often repeat it to me. It's true, the producer in put a link to contact him to be able to buy the DVD but we do not fall directly on a site of purchase of DVD, it is necessary to make a more complex approach to arrive there. The English DVD is sold by edicion lynx and my link does not clock towards them, I do not have make it. Effectively, it's my first contribution to the wiki, and I regret working 18 hours a day to study birds, to make movies and not to have time to contribute to wiki, otherwise I would have made it for a long time. I includes your approach and distrust but I think sincerely that the unique document completely dedicated to this bird deserves its place in wiki. It's true, it is a movie and not a book (I also drafted 38p in Swiss nature paper magazine " The salamander " on this bird but there the only link arrives directly on the page of sale of goes shopping and brings nothing more to the reader of wiki, then I did not put it. There are also extracts of the movie about daily motion, without direct link with the site of sale but it is only about quite small extracts and I did not put them. Tell me of what you think of it with regard to this new lighting and let us try to find a solution for the wiki community. Thank you for your patience. Frank Frankus05 (talk) 09:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, I've seen much more blatant advertising than this, so I'm prepared to give it a chance. What I suggest is that you post the link again, with a more neutral description (no "first and only"), I won't revert, and we can both see what happens. If it survives, I'll accept that, if it's reverted again by another user, you have a problem. I suggest that you put an edit summary something like "re-added after discussion with Jimfbleak" so that it's clear that you aren't just edit warring.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:29, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your open-mindedness. I had already put back this morning, a more sober link towards the page of the movie and you left it. If the description suits you like that, let us see what it will become. I would follow your wise advice if the link was deleted by somebody else. Cordially. Frank Frankus05 (talk) 13:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)