User talk:Frankyboy1983

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jim Watt (boxer), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jim Watt (boxer) was changed by Frankyboy1983 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972357 on 2012-02-20T17:03:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jim Watt (boxer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:10, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Jim Watt (boxer). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kiko4564 (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Irvine, you may be blocked from editing. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kirkintilloch High School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kiko4564 (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2012 (UTC)