User talk:Frasercharlton

Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date.
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

I've noticed that you've been editing pathology related articles -- from your contributions. We have a place where the medically minded people hang out: WikiProject "Clinical Medicine" (WP:CLINMED). You are invited to join or just browse the talk page, which is also known as the doctors' mess. There is also a project specific to pathology (WP:PATH) and the editing of pathology-related articles. Looking at the edits you have done {diff}{diff}, if you are Fraser Charlton you should be aware of the conflict of interest policy and the role of external links in Wikipedia.

If you're looking for info on how to do references in Wikipedia (for medical articles) see: WP:MEDMOS. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nephron T|C 23:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi, I've been distracted a bit lately (vacation, starting residency). So, I didn't manage to get back to you. I think the edits were a COI-- but not an issue 'cause the stuff is somewhat useful and funny. :) Someone else thought they weren't so useful.  I hope you don't take offense... anything you edit here can be re-edited (and made worse). Nephron  T|C 22:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello Fraser!
How nice to see you here at Wikipedia! I see you have been fixing links at some Edwardian musicals' pages. If you click on the history button at the top of edit pages, you will see that I have started many of those articles, but I had very little information to work with. If you can expand any of them, using WP:RS (reliable sources) that you can WP:CITE, that would be great! You certainly know a lot more about the subject than I do! Also, check out WP:G&S. Best regrds, -- Ssilvers 14:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I fixed up your wikilinks at the Edwardian musicals' article, which is a good start. You need to add some citations to the various assertions made in the article, like that The Arcadians was the best one, or that so-and-so was at the height of his powers, etc.  Each paragraph should certainly have at least two citations to sources that support the specific assertions made there.  The external links at the bottom are excellent general sources, but your analysis of the genre is currently lacking any WP:RS references.   On wikipedia, if you don't cite sources, people start coming by and deleting your text.  Also, please do take a look at the blue links in the welcome message above.  They will help you add info to Wikipedia more effectively.  Best regards, -- Ssilvers 17:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)