User talk:Frayae/Safn 10

Your rejection of Draft:Abhijit Wanjarri
Hi ! I noticed that you rejected Draft:Abhijit Wanjarri yesterday. Whilst, you were right in rejecting it, therein, it is not well-referenced and has only source, but, I would like to make you aware of something; in the draft, it is mentioned that Wanjarri is a member of legislative assembly (MLA), which, in India, means that he's a member of a member of the lower house of a state legislature (vidhan sabha/legislative assembly). Ipso facto, Wanjarri would be notable, as, he qualifies WP:NPOL. Nothing wrong with that reject (because of the sourcing, though), just informing you about this for future reference. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 08:29, 6 October 2018 (UTC)


 * It was submitted again, and I took the opportunity to approve it this time. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 14:02, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , thank you for doing so! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 09:02, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you
While I must admit my spirits were dampened when I saw that my Appolition draft was reduced to a mere definition of the term and a few words on how it works, still, I am very grateful that through your review, a draft I made has been accepted y Wikipedia. Thank you very much. I will do what I can to improve that article and continue to productively contribute to the Wikipedia platform. Again, thank you.Gmli82164 (talk) 11:08, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Gmli82164

/* Peril */ Not sure how to be neutral about this story
Dear Frayae

Thank you for deleting "Peril" from my Sandbox. I failed to begin to know the ground rules

Thank you! (Bud (talk) 14:57, 7 October 2018 (UTC)) October 7, 2018

Any ideas?
Hey Frayae. Do you have any thoughts on how to handle editors who write comments like these? It's becoming a lot at times. Thanks! Blomsterhagens (talk) 15:57, 7 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I try and just get on with the discussion and ignore it, lots of people have a rather abrasive way of communicating and I have never found a good way to change that. Just imagine you are speaking to the professor who likes to be rude to people and tactfully work round it. If it get really bad then just try to get more editors involved. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:07, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Will do, thanks Blomsterhagens (talk) 16:10, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Article on "Dasaran Educational Program" got rejected: need guidance
Hello,

Firstly, let me thank you for reviewing the article I created for Dasaran Educational Program, and thanks for the comments.

I do understand your concerns regarding the article, but would like to bring up the following points:

I am a Program-related person, which I stated clearly when starting the article, so that there is no conflict of interest and my connections are not a secret.

Dasaran, as also mentioned in the article, has been recognized as one of the best 5 innovative enterprises in the world - http://www.europe.undp.org/content/geneva/en/home/presscenter/pressreleases/2016/09/13/undp-and-impact-hub-announce-five-international-finalists-in-accelerate-2030.html?cq_ck=1473779317561

This is a great and authentic recognition of the Program, which marks its international exposition, and we believe in the field of educational technologies sharing information on Dasaran would be very informative for other interested parties or individuals. Dasaran was also showcased in multiple academic researches, and so Wikipedia Article can also serve as an initial source to find information.

With the article I want to raise awareness on the Program, which has a lot to offer to the world with its experience. I was aiming to have a mere informative article, and if it does not look like one, I'd ask your help in making it like that. Not being a native English speaker, I might have used some formulations which sound more like an advertisement or over-valuation of the work Dasaran is doing, maybe you or any other Wikipedia editor could edit some parts of the article to make it more neutral? Where and who can I ask to do this?

Regarding the citations, almost all the references are from a 3-rd party source - a governmental website, a famous news portal in Armenia or in the world, with this we wanted to additionally show that whatever is stated in the article, has also been shared by independent source.

Please share your comments, cause I believe Wikipedia needs to have an article on Dasaran, and with your help I suppose we can come to an optimal version of it.

ReinaS22 (talk) 07:43, 8 October 2018 (UTC) ReinaS22


 * You will see at the top of the draft a pink box with the decline reason. I declined it as it appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. if you rewrite it to not be an advert then it may well be that the Dasaran Educational Program can have an article. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:53, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Information regarding rejection of a draft
I noticed an article submitted by me was decline due to lack of notability. Link as here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Adho_Andha_Paravai_Pola. For an upcoming film, it appeared I had added relevant independent sources from most popular news publications in the country and not press releases etc related to the film. Would be helpful if you could help me understand what more is required to continue editing on the article and submitting for a re-review. Thanks ahead. EnsureInfo (talk) 16:40, 7 October 2018 (UTC)


 * You did add good sources. The issue is the number of sources. Generally speaking a film is only notable before release if it is a significantly anticipated picture. There is no set number of sources required, but I would put it in the region of 6+ different sources from different newspapers to have a good article start. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 17:14, 7 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Sure thank you. Will update with further available sources. EnsureInfo (talk) 05:51, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Frayae, I have updated the article with additional independent sources as marked in the WP:ICTFSOURCES. Could you please validate if the article is good for a re-submission. Thanks for your time. EnsureInfo (talk) 07:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Approved and now located at Adho Andha Paravai Pola. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:55, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the guidance. EnsureInfo (talk) 13:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Bharathi Teertha Mahaswami
Hi Frayae,

I was notified that you rejected Draft:Bharathi Teertha Mahaswami on the 7th of October. The reasons cited for the rejection very two in number:

1. Notability of the subject : The person involved is a pontiff of a spiritual seat (matha) and is the 37th person to occupy the seat in a span of 1,200 years which, in itself, is a great achievement/honor. The pontiff is a notable personality especially in the southern part of India and his presence is known to the public through coverage on television and books written about him which have been mentioned in the article. Adequate citations have also been inserted. Further, an article published by a national daily in India says that the temple town of Sringeri in which the pontiff resides received around 38 Lakh footfalls in a year. Given that the main attraction in this town is the huge temple and the matha which is related to it, the pontiff who has been active for almost 45 years should be a notable figure satisfying the general criteria.

2. Tone of the article : In response to your suggestion, I have tried my best to keep the tone at my neutral best. If you still find a lack of formality in tone, please help me by citing the specific phrases which may need revision.

Please note that I have re-submitted the article. Thank you!

Regards,

--Smaranharidashwa (talk) 09:47, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I expect I will leave it to another reviewer for a second opinion. The issue of notability is the requirement for secondary sources about the subject, the tone could still use some work. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:53, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Some secondary sources in the form of books have been cited in the article. There are books and articles in plenty written about the pontiff, but they aren't independent as required by Wikipedia. With regard to the tone, I perused the guideline and have removed all superlatives and adjectives, thereby stating the facts as facts. As requested earlier, please help me by citing the specific phrases which may need revision.


 * I also want to highlight the fact that pages on Wikipedia exist in relation to pontiffs of similar nature where the situation in terms of secondary sources is more or less the same.

Thank you! --Smaranharidashwa (talk) 14:35, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Since drafts are not supposed to stay as such forever, I have approved it to Bharathi Teertha Mahaswami. I still think it needs work. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 14:54, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Ior (mythology)
Hi there. Just wanted to give you a heads-up that an article you accepted from AfC, Ior (mythology), seems to have been made-up - I could find no documentation of it and there is no parallel article on Romanian Wikipedia. It has since been deleted as G3. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * It did look a little dubious. Thanks. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 20:11, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Article created Committee on Public Undertakings (India)
Hi, I thank you for approving my article. I have added categories and also introduced links in related articles to this page. I saw that the article has been graded as C and I understand that it lacks in necessary citations. However, if there are any other aspects of the article other than citations that need to be improved upon, could you please convey them to me. Cheers --Politicoindian (talk) 21:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The main issue is lack of citations, the prose and tables all look good. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 21:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Pearl Charles Draft
Hey Frayae, I noticed that you recently rejected my article on musician, Pearl Charles. I reached out to the live help support. I followed their advice and edited the article to site more notable publications on this artist, and it appears to be up to their standard now. However, they suggested I reach out to you, to see if you have any further advice for me. Please let me know what I need to do. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathanedge (talk • contribs) 01:08, 9 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I see you already submitted the draft, that's all you need to do and someone will review it soon. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:25, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Internet of Medical Things
I have moved this back to draft space. this is horrible and does not belong in mainspace. Jytdog (talk) 03:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I removed most the content and moved it back. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 04:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)