User talk:Frayae/Safn 7

__NOINDEX__

Incident
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Frayae making strange moves to/from draft space. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Drafts containing (version 2) are the second version of a draft, they may be duplicates or require history merging. Appending (version 2) both disambiguates from the other draft and informs later editors or reviewers that there is another draft, which often has a history of rejection. Draft:Khaladdin Musayev (version 2) is a recreation of Draft:Khaladdin Musayev and Draft:Martin Schäuble (version 2) is a recreation of Draft:Martin Schäuble.
 * Draft:Kentik (conflict of interest draft) is exactly what it looks like, a draft by an editor with a conflict of interest. Labelled as such chiefly for convenience of identification. I removed some of the text that was promotional.
 * Broadcast, Unknown-Unicast and Multicast traffic was waiting two months in the AfC queue, I checked to make sure it wasn't a copy of the relevant Cisco manual and published it. The creator has not edited since June, but I will at some point try and improve the article.
 * 7716 edits is misleading, the majority of these are generated by semi-automatic scripts. Over time I have built up a significant edit count through making page moves and minor fixes related to that. I once made over 60 edits dealing with a single move, with minimum manual effort. Every time I press the "move to draft", "draftify", "pageswap", "CSD", or "PROD" buttons I get a number of edits added to my count. My count of real edits is much lower, around 500 or so. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

First, my apologies for jumping the gun and going straight to ANI. I've struck my comments there. For the duplicate drafts, instead of moving them to draft space, I would have just blanked the older versions, or tagged them for deletion. For the one that you believed had COI, I would have moved it to a normal title, and then left a comment. And, finally, for Broadcast, Unknown-Unicast and Multicast traffic, if it was not resubmitted, why did you move it at all, especially since it had been tagged with a number of different problems? I would have just left it there. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 * I am unsure how would go about tagging duplicate drafts for deletion, would this be CSD G6? There is often no ideal way to deal with them. I supposed Khaladdin Musayev should have gone to AfD. And Draft:Martin Schäuble perhaps a history merge.
 * Broadcast, Unknown-Unicast and Multicast traffic was not declined. Yourself and made comments on the 25 June. The original author replied on the talk page and made an additional 33 edits to the article, but there was no reply to this. Since 30 June nothing happened on the article at all. As there was no further work on the article and it had been waiting for a review for 74 days, I assumed it was abandoned and decided it was reasonable for me to do something about it. The concern raised was that it may have been lifted from a Cisco manual. I checked the relevant manuals and found that it was not a copyvio, and I decided to go ahead and publish it myself. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Your reversion
It most certainly does not - see Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Text_formatting. Johnbod (talk) 00:00, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Alternative names are generally in bold in the first sentence of the article. I suppose the best thing to do would be to discuss it on the article talk page. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Only if they redirect to that pages, and not when they have their own page, which is not linked to as it should be! Johnbod (talk) 13:54, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes I agree. Since neither revisions were correctly linked, I have fixed it. Check Special:Diff/858917311. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 14:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Johnbod (talk) 14:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Jonny Ferrari
Hello Frayae. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jonny Ferrari, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''managing notable clients indicates significance. Take it to WP:AFD instead.''' Thank you. So Why  07:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

A question about the page "Chinese occupation of Tibet"
Hello Frayae! I have just receive the news that the page I edited has been deleted. Firstly, I think I hold a neutral view towards this question, listing the opinions from both sides. You can check again if you want. Then, this topic I found on the Wikipedia projects website has already existed. Hence, it is the topic that has orientation. Final, dear editor, it is my assignment in the university and tomorrow is the due time. Could you please recover the page? Best wishes, Murphy. September 10, 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zgan3997 (talk • contribs) 12:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Your article text is available at Special:Permalink/858903765. The point of view issue is primarily confined to the fact that it is disputed whether it was an occupation or not. This is why the topic is titled Tibetan sovereignty debate. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

wormholes
I created Template:Spatial anomalies in fiction. Not sure that's the best name, but we can fix that later. I'm sort of thinking something like Template:Steaming piles of original research in fiction might work better :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 01:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)


 * I can't think of a better name right now, even if someone is bound to think teleportation does not fit. It's a good grouping of articles, but I can't help but agree there is far too much original research involved. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:34, 11 September 2018 (UTC)


 * I copied the formatting from the speculative fiction sidebar to make it look nicer as well. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 17:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw. Looks good, thanks.  -- RoySmith (talk) 22:01, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Make a page for Global Belly
Can you tell why it was deleted? I am new to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heeramani Prasad (talk • contribs) 14:07, 11 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Heeramani Prasad. You can work on the draft located at Draft:Global Belly. Please be aware that the topic has not yet shown to be suitable for a Wikipedia article. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:04, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Great job!
You did a wonderful thing over at Orvis. Thank you. Lovelylinda1980 (talk) 00:20, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Fyers wikipedia page
hi Frayae,

I have created Fyers page on Wikipedia because it is quite famous in India.

I have given some link of Bombay Stock Exchange and SEBI please find.

There are 26 references for this page please go through it.

Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shashank10490 (talk • contribs) 11:46, 15 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Certainly, I carefully examined the references to avoid mistake.


 * 1) "List of Members- Derivatives". BSE India. p. Clearing No. 6697. Retrieved 2018-09-13.
 * A directory listing does not show notability.
 * 1) "Registered Stock Brokers in Currency Derivative Segment". www.sebi.gov.in. Retrieved 2018-09-13.
 * A company listing is a primary source.
 * 1) "FYERS introduces zero brokerage for equity". www.business-standard.com. Retrieved 2018-09-13.
 * Press release published with the disclaimer "auto-generated from a syndicated feed".
 * 1) "Free Investments". Fyers. Retrieved 2018-09-13.
 * The companies own website is a primary source.
 * 1) Kannan, Uma. "FYERS encourages millennials trade online". www.deccanherald.com. DH News Services. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * Good source.
 * 1) "Fintech stock broking firm FYERS introduces zero brokerage for equity". DNA. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * Good source.
 * 1) "Free Investment Zone – Zero Brokerage For Equity Delivery". Fyers. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * The companies own website is a primary source.
 * 1) "FYERS promotes discipline in trading through 30-day challenge". Business Standard. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * Press release published with the disclaimer "auto-generated from a syndicated feed".
 * 1) "FYERS 30 Day Challenge – Your Gateway To Free Trading!". Fyers. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * The companies own website is a primary source.
 * 1) "The NextGen Web Trading Platform!". Fyers. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * The companies own website is a primary source.
 * 1) "Price Ladder Trading". Fyers. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * The companies own website is a primary source.
 * 1) Sarma, Siddhartha. "Fyers Thematic Investing – The Future Of Investing In Indian Stock Markets". www.thestartupjournal.com. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * The Startup Journal report is what's known as a "contributor piece" and not reliable.
 * 1) "FYERS devises thematic investing platform for Indian millennials". DATA QUEST. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * Good source.
 * 1) "FYERS HAS THE MOST HASSLE FREE WAY FOR MILLENIALS TO INVEST IN THE INDIAN STOCK MARKET". First Post. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * Good source.
 * 1) "March of ideas: Broking firms line up thematic play". DNA. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * Good source.
 * 1) "Fyers One Review - Stock Trading Platforms in India". www.adigitalblogger.com. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * Not a reliable source.
 * 1) "Fyers One Review – The Best Stock Screener App". www.stockmaniacs.net. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * Not a reliable source.
 * 1) "Fyers One Review". www.theoptionstrading.com. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * Not a reliable source.
 * 1) "FYERS Markets". Google Play Store. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * Not a reliable source.
 * 1) "FYERS Markets". Apple Itunes. Retrieved 13 September 2018.
 * Not a reliable source.
 * 1) "Want to open a demat account? Here's what you should know". Economic Times. Retrieved 14 September 2018.
 * Passing mention so no good.
 * 1) "Zerodha Vs Fyers Share Broker Comparison". www.chittorgarh.com. Retrieved 14 September 2018.
 * A directory listing does not show notability.
 * 1) "ZERODHA VS FYERS - STOCK BROKERS COMPARISON". www.adigitalblogger.com. Retrieved 14 September 2018.
 * Not a reliable source.
 * 1) "Zerodha Vs Fyers Securities - Broker Comparison". www.prostocks.com. Retrieved 14 September 2018.
 * Not a reliable source.
 * 1) "Fyers Review & Brokerage Charges". top10stockbroker.com. Retrieved 14 September 2018.
 * Not a reliable source.
 * 1) "Fyers vs Zerodha". www.topsharebrokers.com. Retrieved 14 September 2018.
 * Not a reliable source.


 * I can't find anything else in Google. It is possible that those five good sources are enough for an article, but that will be decided in the deletion debate. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

A draft
Thanks Frayae for your suggestions, but I do not understand why you or someone has changed my draft article titled “Vasudevacharya” to “Michael Comans”. This is not correct as the previous name of Vasudevacharya was Michael Comans as noted in citations. Renlock (talk) 14:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * That was me. I have moved the page to Draft:Vasudevacharya. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 14:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Frayae, User:Vasudevacharya should be deleted I think. As a beginner still working my way around the Wiki system.Renlock (talk) 15:00, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * It was confusing, but all fixed now. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:10, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks Renlock (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC)